Chapter 2: Evolution of life cycle thinking as part of the global sustainable consumption and production agenda
Restricted access

Life cycle thinking (LCT) enables the identification of hotspots, or points in the life cycle where the greatest sustainability impact occurs, and helps to inform decisions about product design, production processes and end-of-life management. It also helps to promote more sustainable product design and development by encouraging the use of environmentally friendly materials and processes throughout the entire product life cycle. As such, LCT has gained more and more relevance throughout the last decades and serves nowadays as the basis for various sustainability methods, approaches, policies and regulations. This chapter traces the history of how LCT developed over time, provides an overview of a few key actors involved in the promotion of LCT in the past through to the present day, and lays the foundation for next steps and future actions to accelerate the application of LCT.

  • Balkau, F., Bezama, A., Leroy-Parmentier, N. and Sonnemann, G. (2021). A review on the use of life cycle methodologies and tools in sustainable regional development. Sustainability, 13, 10881. doi:10.3390/su131910881.

  • Barthel, M., Fava, J., James, K., Hardwick, A. and Khan, S. (2017). Hotspots Analysis: An Overarching Methodological Framework and Guidance for Product and Sector Level Application. Retrieved from: https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/download/5863/.

  • Bednarz, A., Beier, J., Grünenwald, T., Himmelreich, B., Hundt, B., Jaeger, F.A., Kirchner, M., Krinke, S., Létinois, U., Merz, C., Mohr, L., Morris, D., Otte, N., Rebitzer, G., Saling, P., Schenker, U.W., Schowanek, D., Vollmer, G., von der Assen, N. and Wathelet, A. (2018). Life cycle management in industry – supporting business with life cycle based assessments. In: Benetto, E., Gericke, K. and Guiton, M. (eds), Designing Sustainable Technologies, Products and Policies (pp.351–363). Springer. doi:10.1007/978–3-319–66981–6_39.

  • Consoli, F., Allen, D., Boustead, I., Fava, J., Franklin, W., Jenson, A., de Oude, N., Parrish, R., Perriman, R., Postlethwaite, D., Quay, B., Seguin, J. and Vigon, B. (1993). Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A ‘Code of Practice’. SETAC Pellston Workshop Series Book. SETAC.

  • Cosme, N., Hauschild, M.Z., Molin, C., Rosenbaum, R.K. and Laurent, A. (2019). Learning-by-doing: Experience from 20 years of teaching LCA to future engineers. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(3), pp.553–565. doi:10.1007/s11367–018–1457–5.

  • Cotana, F. and Manni, M. (eds) (2022). Life Cycle Thinking for a Sustainable Built Environment. Special issue of Energies. Retrieved from: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/energies/special_issues/life_cycle_thinking_sustainable_built_environment.

  • De Lorenzo, D. (2022). Denmark plans tighter rules on green marketing, while European countries might follow suit. Forbes, 30 January. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danieladelorenzo/2022/01/30/denmark-plans-tighter-rules-on-green-marketing-while-european-countries-might-follow-suit/?sh=486d8e2f3823.

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013). Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 1: An Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Retrieved from: https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/towards-the-circular-economy-vol-1-an-economic-and-business-rationale-for-an.

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2022a). Summary of the Pollution Prevention Act. Retrieved from: https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-pollution-prevention-act.

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2022b). About the Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Program. Retrieved from: https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/about-environmentally-preferable-purchasing-program.

  • European Commission (2010). Making Sustainable Consumption and Production a Reality: A Guide for Business and Policy Makers to Life Cycle Thinking and Assessment. Retrieved from : https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/91521.

  • European Commission (2023a). The Development of the PEF and OEF Methods. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/dev_methods.htm.

  • European Commission (2023b). Initiative on Substantiating Green Claims. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/initiative_on_green_claims.htm.

  • European Council (2023). European Green Deal. Retrieved from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/green-deal/.

  • Fankhauser, S., Smith, S.M., Allen, M., Axelsson, K., Hale, T., Hepburn, C., Kendall, J.M., Khosla, R., Lezaun, J., Mitchell-Larson, E., Obersteiner, M., Rajamani, L., Rickaby, R., Seddon, N. and Wetzer, T. (2022). The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. Nature Climate Change, 12, pp.15–21. doi:10.1038/s41558–021–01245-w.

  • Fava, J., Consoli, F., Denison, R., Dickson, K., Mohin, T. and Vigon, B. (1993). A Conceptual Framework for Life-Cycle Impact Assessment. SETAC Pellston Workshop Series Book. SETAC.

  • Fava, J., Denison, R., Jones, B., Curran, M.A., Vigon, B., Selke, S. and Bamum, J. (1991). Technical Framework for Life-Cycle Assessment. SETAC Pellston Workshop Series Book. SETAC.

  • Fava, J., Jensen, A.A., Lindfors, L., Pomper, S., De Smet, B., Warren, J. and Vigon, B. (1994). Life-Cycle Assessment Data Quality: A Conceptual Framework. SETAC Pellston Workshop Series Book. SETAC.

  • Gomes, V., da Silva, M.G. and Kowaltowski, D.C.C.K. (2022). Long-term experience of teaching life cycle assessment and circular design to future architects: A learning by doing approach in a design studio setting. Sustainability, 14(12), 7355. doi:10.3390/su14127355.

  • Hanekamp, J.C., Vera-Navas, G. and Verstegen, S.W. (2005). The historical roots of precautionary thinking: The cultural ecological critique and ‘The Limits to Growth’. Journal of Risk Research, 8, pp.295–310. doi:10.1080/1366987042000265056.

  • Horne, R.E. (2009). Limits to labels: The role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), pp.175–182. doi:10.1111/j.1470–6431.2009.00752.x.

  • Iannuzzi, A. (2017). Greener Products: The Making and Marketing of Sustainable Brands. CRC Press.

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006a). ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html.

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006b). ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html

  • Keep America Beautiful (2023). Mission and History. Retrieved from: https://kab.org/about/approach/mission-history/.

  • Klöpffer, W. (2006). The role of SETAC in the development of LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11, pp.116–122. doi:10.1065/lca2006.04.019.

  • Kunz, N., Atasu, A., Mayers, K. and Van Wassenhove, L. (2014). Extended Producer Responsibility: Stakeholder Concerns and Future Developments. White paper by the INSEAD Social Innovation Center.

  • Lehrburger, C., Mullen, J. and Jones, C.V. (1991). Diapers: Environmental Impacts and Lifecycle Analysis. National Association of Diaper Services.

  • Life Cycle Initiative (2023). What is Life Cycle Thinking? Retrieved from: https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/starting-life-cycle-thinking/what-is-life-cycle-thinking/.

  • Lockwood, A. (2012). The affective legacy of Silent Spring. Environmental Humanities, 1(1), pp.123–140. doi:10.1215/22011919–3610003.

  • Meyer, J.H. (2020). Ideas, actors and political practices in the environmental history of Europe. Digital Encyclopedia of European History. Retrieved from: https://ehne.fr/en/node/21453.

  • Milder, S. (2017). Greening Democracy: The Anti-Nuclear Movement and Political Environmentalism in West Germany and Beyond, 1968–1983. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316471401.

  • Morelli, J. (1999). The history and evolution of environmental management in the U.S. In: Voluntary Environmental Management: The Inevitable Future (pp.9–18). CRC Press.

  • National Park Service (2022). The 1969 Cuyahoga River Fire. Retrieved from: https://www.nps.gov/articles/story-of-the-fire.htm.

  • Olsen, S.I., Fantke, P., Laurent, A., Birkved, M., Bey, N. and Hauschild, M.Z. (2018). Sustainability and LCA in engineering education – a course curriculum. Procedia CIRP, 69, pp.627–632. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.114.

  • One Planet Network (2023). What is SDG 12? Retrieved from: https://sdg12hub.org/sdg-12-hub/what-is-sdg-12.

  • Passer, A., Lasvaux, S., Allacker, K., De Lathauwer, D., Spirinckx, C., Wittstock, B., Kellenberger, D., Gschösser, F., Wall, J. and Wallbaum, H. (2015). Environmental product declarations entering the building sector: Critical reflections based on 5 to 10 years experience in different European countries. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(9), pp.1199–1212. doi:10.1007/s11367–015–0926–3.

  • Piekarski, C.M., Puglieri, F.N., de Carvalho Araújo, C.K., Barros, M.V. and Salvador, R. (2019). LCA and ecodesign teaching via university–industry cooperation. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(6), pp.1061–1079. doi:10.1108/ijshe-11–2018–0206.

  • Sala, S., Amadei, A.M., Beylot, A. and Ardente, F. (2021). The evolution of life cycle assessment in European policies over three decades. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26, pp.2295–2314. doi:10.1007/s11367–021–01893–2.

  • Sanyé-Mengual, E., Lozano, R.G., Farreny, R., Oliver-Solà, J., Gasol, C.M. and Rieradevall, J. (2014). Introduction to the eco-design methodology and the role of product carbon footprint. In: Muthu, S. (eds), Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Different Industrial Sectors, Volume 1 (pp.1–24). Springer. doi:10.1007/978–981–4560–41–2_1.

  • Science Based Targets initiative (STBi) (2023). Science Based Targets – Driving Ambitious Corporate Climate Action. Retrieved from: https://sciencebasedtargets.org.

  • Sonnemann, G., Gemechu, E.D., Sala, S., Schau, E.M., Allacker, K., Pant, R., Adibi, N. and Valdivia, S. (2018). Life cycle thinking and the use of LCA in policies around the world. In: Hauschild, M.Z., Rosenbaum, R.K. and Irving Olsen, S. (eds), Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice (pp.429–463). Springer. doi.org:10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_18.

  • Sönnichsen, S.D. and Clement, J. (2020). Review of green and sustainable public procurement: Towards circular public procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118901. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118901.

  • Stoll, M. (2023). Why Europe Responded Differently from the United States. Retrieved from: https://www.environmentandsociety.org/exhibitions/rachel-carsons-silent-spring/why-europe-responded-differently-united-states.

  • Sustainable Purchasing Leadership Council (2023). Scope 3 GHG Emissions Tools and Resources. Retrieved from: https://www.sustainablepurchasing.org/scope-3-ghg-emissions/.

  • Tillman, A.-M. and Baumann, H. (2002). After 10 Years and 300 Students. Our LCA Teaching Experience. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317600161_After_10_years_and_300_students_Our_LCA_teaching_experience.

  • Udo de Haes, H.A., Jolliet, O., Norris, G. and Saur, K. (2002). UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative: Background, aims and scope. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 7(4), pp.192–195. doi:10.1007/bf02978872.

  • United Nations (2023). The 17 Goals. Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals.

  • Victor, D., Chertow, M. and Esty, D. (1998). Thinking ecologically: The next generation of environmental policy. Ecology, 79, pp.2210–2211. doi:10.2307/176722.

  • Viere, T., Amor, B., Berger, N., Fanous, R.D., Arduin, R.H., Keller, R., Laurent, A., Loubet, P., Strothmann, P., Weyand, S., Wright, L. and Sonnemann, G. (2021). Teaching life cycle assessment in higher education. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26, pp.511–527. doi:10.1007/s11367–020–01844–3.

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2021). Value Chain Carbon Transparency Pathfinder: Enabling Decarbonization through Scope 3 Emissions Transparency. Retrieved from: https://www.wbcsd.org/Programs/Climate-and-Energy/Climate/SOS-1.5/Resources/Value-Chain-Carbon-Transparency-Pathfinder-Enabling-decarbonization-through-Scope-3-emissions-transparency.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account
Handbook