Chapter 11: Defining the goal and scope for life cycle sustainability assessment
Restricted access

This chapter introduces the goal and scope definition for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment studies. It is built on the ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 standards requirements. The Life Cycle Initiative’s Ten Principles for the application of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment provide a harmonized framework which, developed along the ISO four-phases framework, enables practitioners to define the goal and scope of their studies. It requires the definition of the reason for carrying out the study as well as the intended application and audience. Then, the product system and its boundaries are set, and the product utility beyond functional unit (as well as the functional unit itself) is defined. Along these first steps, the development of an understanding of the key stakeholders is crucial to define the relevant potential sustainability impacts along the value chain under study. In this way the stakeholders support the selection of the impact categories to be assessed in addition to other considerations such as data requirements and allocation procedures.

  • Alejandrino, C., Mercante, I., Bovea, M.D. (2021). Life cycle sustainability assessment: Lessons learned from case studies. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 87, 106517, doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106517.

  • Backes, J.G., Traverso, M. (2021). Life cycle sustainability assessment – a survey based potential future development for implementation and interpretation. Sustain., 13(24), 13688, doi:10.3390/su132413688.

  • Environdec (n.d.). Product Category Rules. Available online: (accessed 27 Jul 2022).

  • International Organization for Standardization (2006a). ISO 14040 – Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and framework, Geneva.

  • International Organization for Standardization (2006b). ISO 14044 – Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and guidelines, Geneva.

  • Klöpffer, W. (2008). Life cycle sustainability assessment of products (with Comments by Helias A. Udo de Haes, p. 95). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 13, 89–95, doi:10.1065/lca2008.02.376.

  • Leroy-Parmentier, N., Valdivia, S., Loubet, P., Sonnemann, G. (2023). Alignment of seven of the Life Cycle Initiative’s ‘Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment’ with the LCSA practice: Case studies review. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 28(6), 1–37, doi:10.1007/s11367-023-02162-0.

  • Neugebauer, S., Martinez-Blanco, J., Scheumann, R., Finkbeiner, M. (2015). Enhancing the practical implementation of life cycle sustainability assessment – proposal of a tiered approach. J. Clean. Prod., 102, 165–176, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.053.

  • Rebitzer, G., Hunkeler D. (2003). Life cycle costing in LCM: Ambitions, opportunities, and limitations. Discussing a framework. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 8(5), 253–256.

  • Scope, C., Guenther, E., Schütz, J., Mielecke, T., Mündecke, E., Schultze, K., Saling, P. (2020). Aiming for life cycle sustainability assessment of cement-based composites: A trend study for wall systems of carbon concrete. Dresden Nexus Conference 2020 – Session 4 – Circular economy for building with secondary construction materials to minimise resource use and land use. Civil Eng. Des., 2(5–6), 143–158, doi:10.1002/cend.202000024.

  • Stefanova, M., Tripepi, C., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P. (2014). Goal and scope in life cycle sustainability analysis: The case of hydrogen production from biomass. Sustain., 6, 5463–5475, doi:10.3390/su6085463.

  • Swarr, T.E., Hunkeler, D., Klöpffer, W., Pesonen, H.L., Ciroth, A., Brent, A.C., Pagan, R. (2011). Environmental life-cycle costing: A code of practice. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 16, 389–391, doi:10.1007/s11367–011–0287–5.

  • UNEP (2020). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organizations.

  • UNEP/SETAC (2011). Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment.

  • Valdivia, S., Backes, J.G., Traverso, M., Sonnemann, G., Cucurachi, S., Guinée, J.B., Schaubroeck, T., Finkbeiner, M., Leroy-Parmentier, N., Ugaya, C., et al. (2021). Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 26, 1900–1905, doi:10.1007/s11367–021–01958–2.

  • Valente, A., Iribarren, D., Dufour, J. (2021). Comparative life cycle sustainability assessment of renewable and conventional hydrogen, Sci. Total Environ., 756, 144132, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144132.

  • Visentin, C., Trentin, A.W.D.S., Braun, A.B., Thomé, A. (2020) Life cycle sustainability assessment: A systematic literature review through the application perspective, indicators, and methodologies, J. Clean. Prod., 270, 122509, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122509.

  • Weidema, B., Wenzel, H., Petersen, C., Hansen, K. (2004). The Product, Functional Unit and Reference Flows in LCA. The Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Available online:

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account