Chapter 12: Collecting, assessing and using data for LCSA
Restricted access

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) data form the basis of any LCSA model. The life cycle perspective and the use of processes and products as building blocks and connecting flows for life cycle models are shared by the life-cycle based techniques covering the three sustainability dimensions: environmental, social and economic. The indicators addressed vary from environmental impacts and resources for environmental LCA, to costs and value added for LCC and social indicators for S-LCA. The reliability and quality of recommendations based on LCSA results is crucial for well-informed decision-making. The aim of this chapter is to summarize data quality aspects and learnings of data assessment for the various sustainability dimensions that build an LCSA, with the chapter demonstrating a practical application based on a case study.

  • Almanza, A., and Corona, B. (2020). Using social life cycle assessment to analyze the contribution of products to the Sustainable Development Goals: A case study. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25, 1833–1845.

  • Benoît-Norris, C., Traverso, M., Neugebauer, S., Ekener, E., Schaubroeck, T., Russo Garrido, S., … Arcese, G. (2020). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organizations. UNEP.

  • Ciroth, A. (2008). Cost data quality considerations for eco-efficiency measures. Ecological Economics, 68(6), 1583–1590. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.005.

  • Ciroth, A. (2020). How Reliable Can System Processes Be? Brightcon. Online conference. 20 Oct 2020, https://www.greendelta.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Reliability_system_processes_ac.pdf.

  • Ciroth, A. (2021). Data quality in life cycle inventories. In A. Ciroth and R. Arvidsson (eds), Life Cycle Inventory Analysis, (pp. 97–122). Springer International Publishing.

  • Ciroth, A., and Burhan, S. (2021). Life cycle inventory data and databases. In A. Ciroth and R. Arvidsson (eds), Life Cycle Inventory Analysis (pp. 123–147). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978–3-030–62270–1_6.

  • Ciroth, A., Muller, S., Weidema, B., and Lesage, P. (2016). Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21, 1338–1348.

  • EPA. (2016). Guidance on Data Quality Assessment for Life Cycle Inventory Data. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NRMRL&dirEntryId=321834.

  • European Commission. (2021). Recommendation on the Use of Environmental Footprint Methods. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NRMRL&dirEntryId=321834.

  • Fair Wear Foundation. (2019). India Country Study. https://www.fairwear.org/programmes/countries/india/.

  • Hildenbrand, J. (2008). Ökologisch-ökonomischer Vergleich von Produktionsprozessen als Grundlage für betriebliche Umstellungen. Dissertation, Bergische Universität Wuppertal.

  • International Labour Organization. (2022). Statistics on Employment. Retrieved from ILOSTAT: https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/employment/.

  • ISO. (2006a). ISO 14040. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework.

  • ISO. (2006b). ISO 14044. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines.

  • Loubert, M., and Di Noi, C. (2022a). LCA Case Study: Organic Cotton Sweater. Retrieved from openLCA: https://www.openlca.org/case-studies/.

  • Loubert, M., and Di Noi, C. (2022b). Social LCA Case Study: Organic Cotton Sweater. https://www.openlca.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/report_hooded-sweatshirt_social.pdf.

  • OECD. (2022). OECD.Stat: Trade Union Dataset. Retrieved from OECD.stat: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TUD.

  • ORIENTING. (2020). Operational Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Methodology Supporting Decisions towards a Circular Economy, H2020 EU research project, 2020–2023, https://orienting.eu.

  • PROSUITE (2013). Development and Application of Standardized Methodology for the PROspective Sustainability Assessment of Technologies, FP7 EU research project, 2009–2013, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/227078/reporting/de.

  • SH2E. (2021). Sustainability Assessment of Harmonised Hydrogen Energy Systems: Guidelines for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment and Prospective Benchmarking, H2020 EU research project, 2021–2024, https://sh2e.eu/.

  • Steinberger, J. F. (2009). A spatially explicit life cycle inventory of the global textile chain. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14, 443–455.

  • UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. (2011). Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2011%20-%20Towards%20LCSA.pdf.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account
Handbook