Chapter 24: An analysis of doctoral supervision as pedagogic practice in social science and the role of social research methods in supervision
Restricted access

This chapter explores whether supervision of social science doctoral researchers can be interpreted as pedagogic practice, what this means for the supervisory relationship and the potential consequences for doctoral research. The authors take into account different modes of study and supervision. They examine tensions between teams of supervisors over research methods and the resistance of some supervisors to any formalised research methods training. The chapter draws on Lee’s work on key features of the supervision process and Dowle’s research about how supervisors try to develop particular qualities in students. It refers to recent work on the future of doctoral education and on student and academics’ experiences of research methods teaching. The authors suggest that those who both supervise doctoral researchers and teach social research methods may have a different understanding of what happens when doctoral candidates co-create research methods knowledge and practice, than supervisors who are not involved in collective research methods training.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account