Chapter 10: The independence of media regulatory authorities 'on the books' and 'on the ground'
Restricted access

Independent regulatory authorities are the default choice for regulatory governance in European countries’ audiovisual media sector. Pursuant to European Union law and the standard setting of the Council of Europe, Member States should create conditions for the effective functioning of independent regulatory authorities. The 2018 revision of the EU’s Audiovisual Media Services Directive contains an obligation to designate independent regulatory authorities. Research on independent regulatory authorities suggests that the relationship between higher levels of formal independence (‘on the books’) and actual independence (‘on the ground’) is not linear. Put differently, there are limits to institutional engineering via prescriptive legislation because other factors external to the law play out decisively for regulators’ actual independence. This chapter will explore the research and the practice of independent regulatory authorities in European countries’ audiovisual media sector. The empirical basis is country-level and comparative surveys on independent media supervisory authorities in European countries.

  • Bamberger, K. A., & Mulligan, D. K. (2011). Privacy on the books and on the ground. Stanford Law Review, 63, 247–316. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2230369

  • Cabrera Blázquez, F. J., Denis, G., Machet, E., & McNulty, B. (2021). Media regulatory authorities and the challenges of cooperation. IRIS Plus. European Audiovisual Observatory. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/iris-plus-2021en2-media-regulatory-authorities-and-the-challenges-of-c/1680a55eb1

  • Council of Europe. (2000). Recommendation Rec(2000)23 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the independence and functions of regulatory authorities for the broadcasting sector, adopted on 20 December 2000. Retrieved from https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016804e0322

  • Council of Europe. (2008). Declaration of the Committee of Ministers on the independence and functions of regulatory authorities for the broadcasting sector, adopted on 26 March 2008. Retrieved from https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016805d3c1e

  • Council of Europe. (2022). Recommendation CM/Rec(2022)11 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on principles for media and communication governance, adopted on 6 April 2022. Retrieved from https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=0900001680a61712

  • Craufurd Smith, R., Lauk, E., Stolte, Y., & Kuutti, H. (2013). The independence of media regulatory authorities in Finland and the UK: An assessment. In W. Schulz, P. Valcke, & K. Irion (Eds.), The independence of the media and its regulatory agencies: Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context (pp. 289–332). Intellect.

  • Dragomir, M. (2018). Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep media in line. Journalism, 19(8), 1131–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917724621

  • Dreyer, S. (2013). Locating a regulator in the governance structure: A theoretical framework for the operationalization of independence. In W. Schulz, P. Valcke, & Kristina Irion (Eds.), The independence of the media and its regulatory agencies: Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context (pp. 111–138). Intellect.

  • ECtHR. (2007). Glas Nadezhda EOOD and Elenkov v. Bulgaria, application no. 14134/02.

  • ECtHR. (2008). Case of Meltex Ltd and Mesrop Movsesyan v. Armenia, application no. 32283/04.

  • ECtHR. (2009). Case of Manole and others v. Moldova, application no. 13936/02. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-94075

  • ECtHR. (2012). Case of Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy, application no. 38433/09. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111399

  • Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2016). The politicization of regulatory agencies: Between partisan influence and formal independence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv022

  • European Commission. (2022a). Commission staff working document. 2022 rule of law report country chapter on the rule of law situation in Hungary. SWD(2022) 517 final. Luxembourg. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/48_1_194008_coun_chap_poland_en.pdf

  • European Commission. (2022b). Commission staff working document. 2022 rule of law report country chapter on the rule of law situation in Poland. SWD(2022) 521 final. Luxembourg.

  • European Parliament and the Council (2010). Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). Consolidated text. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/13/2018-12-18

  • European Parliament and the Council (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/1808 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 amending Directive 2010/13/EU on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) in view of changing market realities. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/1808/oj

  • Geradin, D., & Petit, N. (2004). The development of agencies at EU and national levels: Conceptual analysis and proposals for reform (no. 1). Jean Monnet Working Paper. New York. Retrieved from https://jeanmonnetprogram.org/archive/papers/04/040101.pdf

  • Gilardi, F. (2008). Delegation in the regulatory state: Independent regulatory agencies in Western Europe. Edward Elgar.

  • Gilardi, F., & Maggetti, M. (2013). The independence of regulatory authorities. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Handbook on the politics of regulation (pp. 201–214). Edward Elgar.

  • Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hanretty, C., & Koop, C. (2013). Shall the law set them free? The formal and actual independence of regulatory agencies. Regulation & Governance, 7(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01156.x

  • Hans Bredow Institute for Media Research, Interdisciplinary Centre for Law, & ICT (ICRI), Center for Media and Communication Studies (CMCS), Cullen International, & Perspective Associates. (2011). INDIREG: Indicators for independence and efficient functioning of audiovisual media services regulatory bodies for the purpose of enforcing the rules in the AVMS Directive (SMART 2009/0001): final report. Hans-Bredow-Institut for Media Research at the University of Hamburg. Retrieved from https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/2797399/166459_INDIREG_Final_report.pdf

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

  • Irion, K. (2019). The INDIREG study and methodology. In M. Cappello (Ed.), The independence of media regulatory authorities in Europe (pp. 27–34). European Audiovisual Observatory.

  • Irion, K., & Francese Coutinho, M. (2019). Conclusions. In M. Cappello (Ed.), The independence of media regulatory authorities in Europe (pp. 115–122). European Audiovisual Observatory.

  • Irion, K., & Jusić, T. (2014). International assistance and media democratization in the Western Balkans: A cross-national comparison. Global Media Journal. German Edition, 4(2). https://doi.org/nbn:de:gbv:547-201400711

  • Irion, K., & Jusic, T. (2018). Media constrained by context: International assistance and the transition to democratic media in the Western Balkans. CEU Press.

  • Irion, K., & Ledger, M. (2013). Measuring independence: Approaches, limitations and a new ranking tool. In W. Schultz, P. Valcke, & K. Irion (Eds.), The independence of the media and its regulatory agencies: Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context (pp. 139–184). Intellect.

  • Irion, K., Ledger, M., Svensson, S., & Fejzulla, E. (2014). The independence and functioning of the audiovisual media authority of Albania: an assessment using the INDIREG methodology: study commissioned by the Council of Europe. Council of Europe.

  • Irion, K., & Radu, R. (2013). Delegation to independent regulatory authorities in the media sector: A paradigm shift through the lens of regulatory theory. In W. Schultz, P. Valcke, & K. Irion (Eds.), The independence of the media and its regulatory agencies: Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context (pp. 15–54). Intellect.

  • Irion, K., Svensson, S., Ledger, M., & Rsumovic, N. (2017). The independence and functioning of the regulatory authority for electronic media in Serbia, study commissioned by the Council of Europe. Amsterdam/Brussels/Budapest/Belgrade.

  • Irion, K., & Til, G. van. (2019a). Introduction. In M. Cappello (Ed.), The independence of media regulatory authorities (pp. 3–6). Audiovisual Observatory. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/the-independence-of-media-regulatory-authorities-in-europe/168097e504

  • Irion, K., & Til, G. van. (2019b). The evolution of independent regulatory authorities in the audiovisual media sector in European Union law. In M. Cappello (Ed.), The independence of media regulatory authorities in Europe (pp. 19–25). European Audiovidual Observatory.

  • Irion, K., & Valcke, P. (2015). Cultural diversity in the digital age: EU competences, policies and regulations for diverse audiovisual and online content. In E. Psychogiopoulou (Ed.), Cultural governance and the European Union (pp. 75–90). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453754_7

  • Jakubowicz, K. (2007). Keynote speech prepared for delivery at the plenary session: ‘The independence of regulatory authorities’. Prague. Retrieved from https://epra3-production.s3.amazonaws.com/attachments/files/1380/original/EPRA_keynote_KJ.pdf?13236856

  • Jakubowicz, K. (2013). Broadcasting regulatory authorities: Work in progress. In W. Schulz, P. Valcke, & K. Irion (Eds.), The independence of the media and its regulatory agencies: Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context (pp. xi–xxiv). Intellect.

  • Jakubowicz, K., & Sükösd, M. (2008). Finding the right place on the map: Central and Eastern European media change in a global perspective. Intellect.

  • Jusić, T. (2019). Bosnia and Herzegovina. In M. Cappello (Ed.), The independence of media regulatory authorities in Europe (pp. 35–43), European Audiovisual Observatory.

  • Karppinen, K. (2013). Rethinking media pluralism. Fordham University Press.

  • Karppinen, K., & Moe, H. (2016). What we talk about when talk about ‘media independence’. Javnost – The Public, 23(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2016.1162986

  • Kettemann, M. C., & Schulz, W. (Eds.). (2023). Platform://democracy: Perspectives on platform power, public values and the potential of social media councils. Hans-Bredow-Institut. https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.86524

  • Kickert, W. J. M. (1993). Autopoiesis and the science of (public) administration: Essence, sense and nonsense. Organization Studies, 14(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400205

  • Klimkiewicz, B. (2013). Independence or balance of dependencies? Critical remarks on studying conditions of media regulators and public service media in Poland. In W. Schulz, P. Valcke, & K. Irion (Eds.), The independence of the media and its regulatory agencies: Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context (pp. 187–211). Intellect.

  • Koop, C. (2015). Assessing the mandatory accountability of regulatory agencies. In A. C. Bianculli, X. Fernández-i-Marín, & J. Jordana (Eds.), Accountability and regulatory governance (pp. 78–104). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349583_4

  • Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031

  • Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003524

  • Majone, G. (1999). The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems. West European Politics, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389908425284

  • Oster, J. (2015). Media freedom as a fundamental right. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316162736

  • Psychogiopoulou, E., Casarosa, F., & Kandyla, A. (2013). The independence of media regulatory authorities and the impact of the socio-political context: A comparative analysis of Greece and Italy. In W. Schulz, P. Valcke, & K. Irion (Eds.), The independence of the media and its regulatory agencies: Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context (pp. 213–248). Intellect.

  • Puppis, M., & Maggetti, M. (2012). The accountability and legitimacy of regulatory agencies in the communication sector. In M. Puppis & N. Just (Eds.), Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects (pp. 75–94). Intellect. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvj36.7

  • Schmitter, P. C., & Trechsel, A. H. (2004). Green paper on the future of democracy in Europe: Trends, analyses and reforms. Council of Europe.

  • Schulz, W. (2013). Approaches to independence. In W. Schulz, P. Valcke, & K. Irion (Eds.), The independence of the media and its regulatory agencies: Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context (pp. 2–11). Intellect.

  • Scott, C. D. (2000). Accountability in the regulatory state. Journal of Law and Society, 27(2), 38–60.

  • Stevens, D. (2013). Media regulatory authorities in the EU context: Comparing sector-specific notions and requirements of independence. In W. Schulz, P. Valcke, & K. Irion (Eds.), The independence of the media and its regulatory agencies: Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context (pp. 83–110). Intellect.

  • Thatcher, M. (2002). Delegation to independent regulatory agencies: Pressures, functions and contextual mediation. West European Politics, 25(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601588

  • Thatcher, M., & Stone Sweet, A. (2002). Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. West European Politics, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601583

  • Valcke, P., Picard, R. G., & Sükösd, M. (2015). A global perspective on media pluralism and diversity: Introduction. In P. Valcke, M. Sükösd, & R. G. Picard (Eds.), Media pluralism and diversity (pp. 1–19). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304308_1

  • Valcke, P., Voorhoof, D., & Lievens, E. (2013). Independent media regulators: Condition sine qua non for freedom of expression? In W. Schulz, P. Valcke, & K. Irion (Eds.), The independence of the media and its regulatory agencies: Shedding new light on formal and actual independence against the national context (pp. 55–81). Intellect.

  • Voltmer, K. (2011). How far can media systems travel? In D. C. Hallin & P. Mancini (Eds.), Comparing media systems beyond the Western world (pp. 224–245). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139005098.013

  • Wójcik, A. (2023, October 20). Restoring Poland’s Media Freedom. Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/restoring-polands-media-freedom/

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account