Chapter 4: Towards a systematic understanding on the challenges of public procurement of artificial intelligence in the public sector
Restricted access

There is increased interest amongst governments and public sector organisations about how to best integrate artificial intelligence into their day-to-day business processes. Yet, a large majority of technical know-how is concentrated outside of the governmental sector, and many governmental organisations are likely to rely on public procurement for their AI systems. Thus, there is a clear need for new insight into the process of AI procurement, challenges that may be encountered, and guidelines on how to potentially overcome such challenges. This chapter aims to make an initial contribution of such insight. Methodologically, this chapter presents a multiple case study of four European countries (Estonia, the Netherlands, Serbia, and the United Kingdom) who have drafted guidelines and recommendations for how to procure AI in the public sector. As a result of this research, it is possible to provide an overview of challenges that may be encountered during the procurement of AI in the public sector and potential solutions for the public sector to overcome such challenges.

  • Agarwal, P. K. (2018). Public administration challenges in the world of AI and bots. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 917–921.

  • AI HLEG (2019). A definition of Artificial Intelligence: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines.

  • Amsterdam City. (2020). Explanatory memorandum to the standard clauses for municipalities for fair use of algorithmic systems.

  • Aoki, N. (2020). An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4).

  • Benbouzid, B. (2019). To predict and to manage. Predictive policing in the United States. Big Data Society, 6(1).

  • Berryhill, J., Kok Heang, K., Clogher, R., and McBride, K. (2019). Hello, World: Artificial Intelligence and Its Use in the Public Sector (Vol. 36). OECD Publishing.

  • Birks, M., and Mills, J. (2015). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). SAGE.

  • Brauneis, R., and Goodman, E. P. (2018). Algorithmic transparency for the smart city. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 20(103), 103–176.

  • Brown, T. L., and Potoski, M. (2003). Contract-management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Administration Review, 63(2) 153–164.

  • Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., and Narayanan, A. (2017). Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science, 356(6334), 183–186.

  • Campion, A., Gasco-Hernandez, M., Jankin Mikhaylov, S., and Esteve, M. (2020). Overcoming the challenges of collaboratively adopting artificial intelligence in the public sector. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2),

  • Dempsey, M., McBride, K., Haataja, M., and Bryson, J. (2022). Transnational digital governance and its impact on artificial intelligence. The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance. Oxford University Press.

  • Edler, J., Ruhland, S., Hafner, S., Rigby, J., Georghiou, L., Hommen, L., Rolfstam, M., Charles, E., Tsipouri, L., and Papadakou, M. (2006). Innovation and public procurement. Review of issues at stake. Study for the European Commission (no entr/03/24); (2006). Fraunhofer Institute for Systems; Innovation Research.

  • Edquist, C., Hommen, L., and Tsipouri, L. (eds). (2000). Public Technology Procurement and Innovation (Vol. 16). Springer US. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4611-5

  • Georghiou, L., Edler, J., Uyarra, E., and Yeow, J. (2014). Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 1–12.

  • Government of Serbia. (2019). Strategy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in the Republic of Serbia for the Period 2020–2025 (tech. rep.). Government of Serbia. content/EN/TXT/?uri= COM%3A2018%3A237%3AFIN

  • Harrison, T. M., and Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2020). Cultivating trustworthy artificial intelligence in digital government. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2),

  • House of Lords. (2018). House of Lords Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence AI in the UK: ready, willing and able? Report of Session 2017–19 (tech. rep.). London.

  • Hsieh, H.-F., and Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9).

  • Janssen, M., Brous, P., Estevez, E., Barbosa, L. S., and Janowski, T. (2020). Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101493 [1–8].

  • McBride, K., Aavik, G., Toots, M., Kalvet, T., and Krimmer, R. (2019). How does open government data driven co-creation occur? Six factors and a ‘perfect storm’; insights from Chicago’s food inspection forecasting model. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 88–97.

  • Misuraca, G., Van Noordt, C., et al. (2020). AI watch-artificial intelligence in public services: Overview of the use and impact of AI in public services in the EU. JRC Working Papers, (JRC120399).

  • MKM. (2020). Juhendmaterjalid – Krattide veebileht. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from

  • Mulligan, D. K., and Bamberger, K. A. (2019). Procurement as policy: Administrative process for machine learning. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 34(3), 773–852.

  • Office for AI, world economic forum, government digital service, government commercial function, & crown commercial service. (2020). Guidelines for AI procurement. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from

  • Riigikantselei, and MKM. (2019). Eesti tehisintellekti kasutuselevõtu eksperdirühma aruanne (tech. rep.). Tallinn.

  • van Noordt, C., and Misuraca, G. (2019). New wine in old bottles: Chatbots in government: Exploring the transformative impact of chatbots in public service delivery. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11686 LNCS, 49–59.

  • van Noordt, C., and Misuraca, G. (2020). Exploratory insights on artificial intelligence for government in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2),

  • van Noordt, C., and Misuraca, G. (2022). Artificial intelligence for the public sector: Results of landscaping the use of AI in government across the European Union. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3),

  • Washington, A. L. (2018). How to argue with an algorithm: Lessons from the COMPAS-ProPublica debate. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 17(1), 131–160.

  • Wihlborg, E., Larsson, H., and Hedström, K. (2016). ‘The computer says no!’ – A case study on automated decision-making in public authorities. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2016–March, 2903–2912.

  • Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., and Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector – applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615.

  • World Economic Forum. (2020). AI procurement in a box: Project overview unlocking public sector AI (tech. rep.).

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Rev.). Sage publications.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account