Chapter 16: The platformisation of global development
Restricted access

This chapter explores how deployment of digital platforms aligns with the behavioural turn in global development to create conditions for experimentation with new forms of privatised behavioural governance. It draws on documented examples in biometric verification, digital finance, and technical assistance to smallholder farmers. Processes of “platformisation” secure and extend economic advantage for dominant market actors and reorient the state towards generation of demand for their services. This consolidation of market dominance and data capture by transnational firms is enabled by outdated global governance frameworks designed to address digital exclusion rather than the reality of “adverse digital incorporation”. As infrastructures of “high-tech modernism” digital platforms render populations legible in ways that intensify pre-existing inequalities and erode human agency by design. This poses particular risks to populations whose livelihoods depend on informal institutions of mutuality and reciprocity – as informal, solidaristic relations are displaced by vertical relations of market dependence.

  • Aitken, R. (2010), ‘Ambiguous incorporations: Microfinance and global governmentality’, Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs 10 (2), 223–243.

  • Aitken, R. (2017), ‘“All data is credit data”: Constituting the unbanked’, Competition and Change 21 (4), 274–300.

  • Alonso-Fradejas, A., S. M. Borras Jr, T. Holmes, E. Holt-Giménez, and M. J. Robbins (2015), ‘Food sovereignty: Convergence and contradictions, conditions and challenges’, Third World Quarterly 36 (3), 431–448.

  • Berndt, C. (2015), ‘Behavioural economics, experimentalism and the marketization of development’, Economy and Society 44 (4), 567–591.

  • Berndt, C., and M. Boeckler (2017), ‘Economic, experiments, evidence: Poor behavior and the development of market subjects’, in V. Higgins and W. Larner (eds), Assembling Neoliberalism: Expertise, Practices, Subjects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 283–302.

  • Brooks, S. (2016), ‘Inducing food insecurity: Financialisation and development in the post-2015 era’, Third World Quarterly 37 (5), 768–780.

  • Brooks, S. (2021), ‘Configuring the digital farmer: A nudge world in the making?’, Economy and Society 50 (3), 374–396.

  • Cullather, N. (2004), ‘Miracles of modernisation: The green revolution and the apotheosis of technology’, Diplomatic History 28 (2), 227–254.

  • Farrell, H., and M. Fourcade (2023), ‘The moral economy of high-tech modernism’, Daedalus 152 (1), 225–235.

  • Fine, B. (2012), ‘Neo-liberalism in retrospect? It’s financialisation, stupid’, in C. Kyung-Sup, B. Fine, and L. Weiss (eds), Developmental Politics in Transition: The Neoliberal Era and Beyond, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 51–69.

  • Fine, B., D. Johnston, A. C. Santos, and E. Van Waeyenberge (2016), ‘Nudging or fudging: The World Development Report 2015’, Development and Change 47 (4), 640–663.

  • Frank, A. G. (1966), ‘The development of underdevelopment’, Monthly Review 18 (4), 17–31.

  • Fraser, A. (2018), ‘Land grab/data grab: Precision agriculture and its new horizons’, The Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (5), 893–912.

  • Gabor, D., and S. Brooks (2017), ‘The digital revolution in financial inclusion: International development in the fintech era’, New Political Economy 22 (4), 423–436.

  • Hart, G. (2010), ‘D/developments after the Meltdown’, Antipode 41, 117–141.

  • Heeks, R. (2008), ‘ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development’, Computer 41 (6), 26–33.

  • Heeks, R. (2010), ‘Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development?’, Journal of International Development 22 (5), 625–640.

  • Heeks, R. (2022), ‘Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: Conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the Global South’, Information Technology for Development 28 (4), 688–704.

  • Iazzolino, G. (2021), ‘Infrastructure of compassionate repression: Making sense of biometrics in Kakuma refugee camp’, Information Technology for Development 27 (1),111–128.

  • Iazzolino, G., and L. Mann (2019), ‘Harvesting data: Who benefits from platformization of agricultural finance in Kenya?’, Developing Economics, 14 April. https://developingeconomics.org/2019/03/29/harvesting-data-who-benefits-from-platformization-of-agricultural-finance-in-kenya/?blogsub=subscribed#subscribe-blog (accessed 30 April 2023).

  • Isakson, S. R. (2015), ‘Derivatives for development? Small-farmer vulnerability and the financialization of climate risk management’, Journal of Agrarian Change 15 (4), 569–580.

  • Jain, S., and D. Gabor (2020), ‘The rise of digital financialisation: The case of India’, New Political Economy 25 (5), 813–828.

  • Johnson, L., B. Wandera, N. Jensen, and R. Banerjee (2019), ‘Competing expectations in an index-based livestock insurance project’, The Journal of Development Studies 55 (6), 1221–1239.

  • Kaminska, I. (2015), ‘When financial inclusion stands for financial intrusion’, Financial Times: FT

  • Alphaville, 31 July. http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2015/07/31/2135943/when-financial-inclusion-stands-

  • for-financial-intrusion/ (accessed 30 April 2023).

  • Kear, M. (2013), ‘Governing homo subprimicus: Beyond financial citizenship, exclusion, and rights’, Antipode 45 (4), 926–946.

  • Klein, E. (2017), ‘The World Bank on mind, behaviour and society’, Development and Change 48 (3), 481–501.

  • Lahaye, E, T. E. Abell, and J. K. Hoover (2017), ‘Vision of the future: Financial inclusion 2025’, CGAP, https://www.cgap.org/sites/default/files/Focus-Note-Vision-of-the-Future-Jun-2017_0.pdf (accessed 30 April 2023).

  • Langley, P., and A. Leyshon (2016), ‘Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation’, Finance and Society 3 (1), 11–31.

  • Langley, P., and A. Leyshon (2022), ‘Neo-colonial credit: FinTech platforms in Africa’, Journal of Cultural Economy 15 (4), 401–415.

  • Leftwich, A. (1995), ‘Bringing politics back in: Towards a model of the developmental state’, The Journal of Development Studies, 31 (3), 400–427.

  • Mann, L. (2018), ‘Left to other peoples’ devices? A political economy perspective on the big data revolution in development’, Development and Change 49 (1), 3–36.

  • Mann, L., and G. Iazzolino (2019), ‘See, nudge, control and profit: Digital platforms as privatized epistemic infrastructures’, IT for Change, https://projects.itforchange.net/platformpolitics/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Digital-Platforms-as-Privatized-Epistemic-Infrastructures-_5thMarch.pdf (accessed 30 April 2023).

  • Martin, A., G. Sharma, S. P. de Souza, L. Taylor, B. van Eerd, S. M. McDonald, M. Marelli, M. Cheesman, S. Scheel, and H. Dijstelbloem (2023), ‘Digitisation and sovereignty in humanitarian space: Technologies, territories and tensions’, Geopolitics, 28 (3), 1362–1397. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2022.2047468.

  • Masiero, S. (2017), Aadhaar, demonetisation, and the poor’, Perspectives, https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/money-finance/aadhaar-demonetisation-and-the-poor.html, 9 January 2017 (accessed 30 April 2023).

  • Mawdsley, E. (2016), ‘Development geography II: Financialization’, Progress in Human Geography 2 (2), 264–274.

  • Mitchell, K., and M. Spark (2016), ‘The new Washington Consensus: Millennial philanthropy and the making of global market subjects’, Antipode 48 (3), 724–749.

  • Mkandawire, T. (2001), ‘Thinking about developmental states in Africa’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 25 (3), 289–314.

  • Patel, R. (2013), ‘The long green revolution’, The Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (1), 1–63.

  • Rankin, K. N. (2001), ‘Governing development: Neoliberalism, microcredit, and rational economic woman’, Economy and Society 30 (1), 18–37.

  • Ruppert, E. (2011), ‘Population objects: Interpassive subjects’, Sociology 45 (2), 218–233.

  • Scott, J. C. (1998), Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Soederberg, S. (2013), ‘Universalising financial inclusion and the securitisation of development’, Third World Quarterly 34 (4), 593–612.

  • Taylor, L. (2017), ‘What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally’, Big Data & Society 4 (2), 2053951717736335.

  • Taylor, M. (2012), ‘The antinomies of financial inclusion: Debt, distress and the workings of Indian microfinance’, Journal of Agrarian Change 12 (4), 601–610.

  • Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • WEF (2012), ‘Big data, big impact: New possibilities for international development’, New York: World Economic Forum. www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TC_MFS_BigData BigImpact_Briefing_2012.pdf (accessed 30 April 2023).

  • Williamson, J. (1990), The Washington Consensus, Washington, DC, https://books.google.co.uk/books

  • ?hl=en&lr=&id=mpu-DAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA13&ots=MhNTQF8wz_&sig=iDMmW5E_dOt

  • TdloTK6WM8Hvajec#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed 30 April 2023).

  • World Bank (2015), World Development Report 2015: Mind, Society, and Behavior, Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Zuboff, S. (2019), The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, London: Profile Books.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account