Chapter 18: The challenges of establishing the facts in relation to ‘Hague law’ violations
Restricted access

Criminal prosecutions relating to crimes regulated by traditional ‘Hague law’ are few and far between. A key question worth considering is whether or not the ultimate challenge remains at the micro level; the ultimate challenge lies in ascertaining legally pertinent facts which are required to make sound and clear legal adjudications, be they criminal or civil in nature, in relation to this specific body of international humanitarian law (IHL). Facts are the building blocks of any legal assessment, pieces of the jigsaw puzzle that when compiled together can help elucidate a legally relevant picture. Any legal adjudication of ‘Hague law’ must necessarily determine adherence to a primary rule; the same is as true for criminal prosecution as it is for a commission of inquiry. In short relevant facts must be compiled in order to form a coherent legal assessment. Like any good jigsaw some pieces will be easier to spot than others, for example it is easier to objectively determine the number of victims in a given attack, yet conversely knowing whether or not those persons were legitimate targets, whether or not they were the direct object of attack and what was the subjective perception of the attacking party are necessarily more challenging ‘facts’ to determine.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account
Monograph Book