Handbook of Research on Knowledge Management
Show Less

Handbook of Research on Knowledge Management

Adaptation and Context

Edited by Anders Örtenblad

This innovative Handbook aims to examine whether there is a need to adapt and widen our understanding of knowledge management. A common definition of knowledge management is taken as the starting point for discussions on its relevance in various contexts, such as Buddhist organizations, law firms, the army and indigenous organizations. Moreover, the universality of Ikujiro Nonaka’s ideas on knowledge management is explored, and some alternative definitions are suggested. This book will appeal to academics and students of business and management, business administration, sociology and organizational behavior. Practitioners, managers and business-owners will also find this an invaluable resource.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 20: On the complexity of knowledge management given the tacitness of knowledge in organizations

Thomas Garavan, Fergal O’Brien and Eamonn Murphy


Tacit knowledge is a major topic within the knowledge management literature (Gourlay 2000; Castillo 2002; Freeze and Kulkarni 2007). It is a fundamental issue when discussing knowledge in organizations and considered both a hot topic and a challenge for organizations to understand how best to utilize tacit knowledge for competitive advantage. The theory argues that some knowledge is codifiable and therefore is easily transferred using information technology (Speir and Venkatesh 2002), whereas tacit knowledge is not easily transferred due to its stickness and its reliance on people to be shared (Inkpen and Dinur 1998). However, there is convincing evidence that the effective use of tacit knowledge creates value and enhances financial performance (Fletcher and Harris 2012). This suggests that tacit knowledge can be a source of competitive advantage and it has focused organizations on understanding how tacit knowledge is exchanged, shared and sought by employees (Katz et al. 2000). Tacit knowledge is a key factor in organizational learning (Hau and Evangelista 2007), innovation (Cavusgil et al. 2003) and long-term competitive advantage (Hooley et al. 2005). These outcomes are premised on the ability of an organization to utilize tacit knowledge effectively. However, a number of challenges are evident. First, there is no single agreed definition or understanding of what constitutes tacit knowledge (Castillo 2002; Ray 2008). Second, there is an acceptance that technology and codification are not particularly effective in facilitating the transfer and use of tacit knowledge to enhance organizational effectiveness (McIver et al. 2012, 2013).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.