Contributions to Disciplinary Thought
Edited by Jean d’Aspremont and Sahib Singh
Chapter 51: Revolutionaries
This chapter examines the conceptual belonging of ‘revolutionaries’ in international law in three sections. It argues that a conceptual history that explores where, how and why a concept belongs to a discipline can help one to understand, and come to terms with, the concept’s past(s), present(s) and future(s). Specifically, it argues first that etymology, as a technique, shows us that the epistemic place of the concept of revolutionaries is both within and outside of the discipline of international law depending on when the question is posed; second, that the concept’s fit into two extant categories of international law – state responsibility and recognition – is contiguous; and finally, that the concept’s purpose in the discipline of international law is up for grabs and depends on how the discipline decides who counted, who counts and who will count as a revolutionary in international law. This answer to this question ultimately lies in our understanding of the role played by justice and imagination in the international legal order.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.