Chapter 11: When transnational authority is contingent: three African instances
Restricted access

Three recent examples of the application of transnational legal authority in Africa are examined. They show that what purports to be fixed and authoritative law is frequently quite contingent. Two of the examples are formal court cases, the third is the relationship between donors and receivers in a programme of economic development. The theoretical frameworks employed to address these instances include: (1) treating situational occurrences as diagnostic events; (2) taking a general processual approach to society, treating it as a continuously ongoing entity experiencing dynamic shifts and continuities; and (3) giving weight to the relevant semi-autonomous social fields, i.e. to the common non-governmental social fields which generate and enforce their own rules. These are enforceable norms that are not official laws. In all of these examples events are publicly presented as the application of laws and rules, yet it is obvious that unacknowledged political issues play a major role in the outcome.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account
Monograph Book