This chapter argues that Marxist economics cannot explain the present crisis because, as a discipline, it is not geared to. It is an oxymoron attempting fit Marxism to the methodological frame of marginalist neoclassical economics. The latter is antithetical to Marxism because it is ahistorical. In place of Marxist economics, this chapter proposes a geopolitical economy which exploits the resources of the historical the traditions of classical political economy and the critics of neoclassical economics in a way that enables us to view the present crisis in its historical and world perspective. It proceeds by first outlining a critique of Marxist economics and follows it up with a discussion of the variety of forms of capitalist crises. These discussions clear the ground for a historical view of value production and an understanding of the drivers of its own history. A full account of the present crisis being impossible here, the chapter closes with sketches of how geopolitical economy would approach two key elements of it: consumption demand and international capital flows.
Other access options
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Log in with your Elgar Online account