In this chapter I contemplate the future directions of feminist engagement with refugee law. Unlike other areas of international law where feminist analysis is minimal or entirely absent, refugee law has attracted considerable attention from feminist scholars and practitioners. This has led to claims that issues of gender and sexuality in refugee law have transitioned from ‘the margins to the centre’. In contrast to this view, I assert that feminist engagement with refugee law remains on periphery of the field due to the fact that gender analyses of refugee law and policy are siloed within issues that have obvious gender dimensions. I argue that the feminist agenda must include feminist examinations of all areas of refugee law and policy – not just topics where gender issues are immediately evident. I use two seemingly gender-neutral topics (the exclusion clause and the concept of surrogate state protection) to demonstrate the ways in which feminist analysis can unmask previously ignored gender concerns, interrogate and destabilise core assumptions in current policy and provide fresh and alternate insights on primary legal texts.
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your Elgar Online account
-
Front Matter
-
PART I: DIVERSIFYING FEMINIST ENGAGEMENT WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW
-
PART II: MAKING FEMINIST ENGAGEMENT WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW MORE INFLUENTIAL: NOT JUST TALKING TO OURSELVES
-
PART III: FEMINIST ENGAGEMENT WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW: IMPROVING WOMEN’S LIVES
-
PART IV: BUILDING BRIDGES WITH OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
