Edited by Robin West and Cynthia G. Bowman
Chapter 11: Violence against women and liberal sexism
This chapter tells a history of opposition to the first US attempts to legislate against violence against women. It begins with the conservative battle – waged in the name of preserving the family – against federal legislation on battering and how that theme resurfaced decades later in the US Supreme Court decision striking down a civil rights remedy in the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) as too close to covering ‘domestic relations.’ Now forgotten, however, is the history of liberal resistance to VAWA. When first broached, some women’s groups suggested that VAWA was not necessary, that violence against women was not a significant problem. Liberal groups argued that its provisions were inadequate to address more pressing concerns faced by minorities. Theorizing this opposition as ‘liberal sexism,’ this chapter elaborates the background norms that help to explain liberals’ blindness to women’s injuries – including the moral prioritization of race to sex, criminal law defendant to victim, and minorities to majorities.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.