Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis
Show Less

Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis

Edited by B. Guy Peters and Guillaume Fontaine

Public policy research has become increasingly comparative over the past several decades, but the methodological issues involved in this research have not been discussed adequately. This Handbook provides a discussion of the fundamental methodological issues in comparative policy research, as well as descriptions and analyses of major techniques used for that research. The techniques discussed are both quantitative and qualitative, and all are embedded in the broader discussion of comparative research design.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Comparing historical cases: advances in comparative historical research

Grace Jaramillo


Comparative Historical Analysis (CHA) has a strong tradition of analysing long patterns of policy change. The method is useful to theory-testing and theory-building because it looks for all possible causal variables influencing policy change over long periods of time. CHA combines techniques like process tracing, archival research, statistical methods and in-depth interviews to assess causal process observations. From the methodological perspective, time frames of analysis and types of policy change became the centre of discussions about advancing CHA methods in recent years. The result was refinements in the definition of events, critical junctures and sequences. But how to assess policy change and attribute causality when the timeline of observations is long, and changes become embedded or blurred with structural context or the institutional framework? This chapter advances the discussion by proposing the use of an index of policy interventions as a suitable tool to organize, classify and validate the significant amount of causal process observations and quantitative data points, resulting from small-N comparisons. The author argues that time frame validation can be a key component of comparative policy analyses that entail long-term cycles of policy, because it can help identify the type of change at stake and to understand the existence of cumulative causes and/cumulative outcomes that are blurred within a complex structure of events. Furthermore, an index of policy intervention could help to increase internal validity for the time frame of analysis and the importance of sequence in the developing of positive or negative feedback in the process of change.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.