Following participation in armed forces or armed groups, former child soldiers frequently need assistance that promotes their reintegration into families and communities. Although reintegration programmes for former child soldiers can have positive outcomes, they may also cause unintended negative consequences and violate the humanitarian imperative of ‘do no harm’. Aiming to bring ethical issues associated with reintegration programming out of the margins, this chapter examines three broad categories of do no harm issues in regard to reintegration work: (1) discrimination; (2) the imposition of outsider approaches; and (3) the increase in child protection issues. Using examples from a variety of conflict settings, the chapter examines unintended harms related to excessive targeting of former child soldiers for support; gender discrimination; stigma; violation of children’s participation rights; the marginalization of cultural understandings of mental health and psychosocial issues; the absence of measures for enabling the accountability of former child soldiers to local communities; raised expectations amidst short-term supports; labelling; re-recruitment; and the securitization of reintegration processes, with former child soldiers at times depicted as ‘terrorists’. The chapter offers strategies for preventing or managing these harms.
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your Elgar Online account
-
Front Matter
-
Part I: The Concept and Construction of the Child Soldier
-
Part II: Conduct: Agency, Capacity and Resilience
-
Part III: Encounters with the Law
-
Part IV: Afterworld(S)/Afterwards: Transitional Justice and Beyond
-
Part V: Epilogue
