Chapter 10: Transgressing boundaries through new Legal Realist approaches: Affinity and collaboration within ethnographic research on immigration law and policy
Restricted access

New Legal Realist approaches often examine law-in-practice, as experienced by the agents who carry out the law, the individuals who are law’s targets, and the communities that law brings into being. Ethnography, a flexible research process that positions researchers within these communities, is a particularly appropriate a new legal realist research method. Using the example of ethnographic research regarding U.S. immigration law and policy, the author explores how crossing boundaries between law and social sciences, research and praxis, and individual and collaborative research produces new legal realist approaches. Law and social sciences can be bridged by emphasizing their affinities, such as interviewing, note-taking, crafting papers or statements, deploying evidence to substantiate arguments, citing relevant studies and legal opinions, and gaining insight into social contexts. Boundaries between research and praxis can be crossed through engaged research and through fieldwork that places researchers in the role of practitioners, thus facilitating the translation of research findings into policy arenas. Assembling interdisciplinary research teams crosses boundaries between individual and collaborative work and furthers new legal realist approaches by making “translation” intrinsic to the research process itself.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account
Handbook