Chapter 4: The world as it is: a vision for a social science (and policy) turn in climate justice
Restricted access

Climate justice is overwhelmingly cosmopolitan. Cosmopolitan forms of climate justice are defensible, but given the failure of ethics to penetrate climate policy, and of climate policy to gain political traction, perhaps we ought to stop asking whether our accounts of climate justice are ‘right or wrong’ and start asking why they have not worked thus far. This chapter lays out a research agenda that brings together moral philosophy and the social sciences to develop a more effective approach to climate justice by identifying three key worldviews – traditional, modern and postmodern – that fuel gridlock on climate. Put simply, the climate justice debate has been framed as a zero-sum conflict between moderns and post-moderns that ignores traditionalists. We need to seek ways of framing climate justice and communicating climate policy that aim at convergence and congruence between the major worldviews.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account
Edited by
Monograph Book