Chapter 19: Transcending disciplinary fetishisms: Marxism, neocolonialism, and international law
Restricted access

After the end of the Second World War, Marxism trifurcated into western, Soviet, and Third World forms. This trifurcation has produced a theoretical landscape that mystifies national oppression - the nub of imperialism and neocolonialism - as a specific type of oppression. By operating within this theoretical landscape, Marxists have succumbed to the disciplinary fetishisms of mainstream capitalist epistemologies. This chapter considers the way legal fetishism, state fetishism, and market fetishism render neocolonialism invisible in the era of transnational monopoly finance capitalism that set in after the Second World War. It concludes with reflections on different strands of Lenin’s thoughts, and their relevance for developing an explanatory critique of international law and neocolonialism from Marxist perspectives in the current ‘epoch of imperialism’.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account