Chapter 25: Gaining ethical approval
Restricted access

The words “gaining ethical approval” bring to mind the ethics committee or International Review Board. All doctoral candidates are aware that the ethical approval process is there for a reason. However, too often graduate student chatter focuses on describing ethical approval as an adversarial process, with students dreading this part of their doctoral journey. The chapter asks, what if the process of pursuing ethical research starts long before the ethical approval application is submitted? What if ethical approval considerations were applied to all phases of the process, instead of the one point of gaining approval? It argues that, if this approach were applied, the ethical approval check point would come to provide a welcome opportunity to leverage the support and guidance available to ensure ethical practices in students’ work – and to keep the dissertation moving! The author’s own experiences are recalled throughout the chapter, which concludes with five key lessons.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account
Monograph Book