Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional?
Show Less

Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional?

Edited by Susy Frankel

The international intellectual property (IP) law system allows states to develop policies that reflect their national interests. Therefore, although there is an international minimum standards framework in place, states have widely varying IP laws and differing interpretations of these laws. This book examines whether pluralism in IP law is functional when applied to copyright, patents and trademarks on an international basis.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: ‘Copyright is an engine of free expression’ or ‘free expression is an engine of copyright’?

Chongnang Wiputhanupong


This chapter discusses the various models and approaches to collective management of copyright and related rights in the EU. The models include mere representation of groups of authors’ structures, public bodies responsible – pursuant to the law – for managing authors’ rights, commercial companies and actual consortia. Competition law and national policies impact these bodies in different ways. This chapters looks at the effects of the different models, their goals and the problems of management of rights at EU level.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.