Chapter 8: Animal subjectivities and lifeworlds: working with and learning from animals through the practice of multispecies participant observation
Restricted access

I examine multispecies participant observation as a methodology in animal geographies for investigating the subjectivities and lifeworlds of animals and discuss how Gruen’s (2015; 2016) notion of entangled empathy and Gillespie’s (2017) idea of intimacy help to facilitate, complicate and strengthen this methodological practice. I illustrate what this looks like by drawing on a case study of exploring the lives of cows at a small grass-fed beef farm. In discussing key methodological considerations, I advance multispecies participant observation as an essential methodology in animal geographies, furthering its agenda of understanding animals’ subjectivities and lifeworlds to enhance human-animal relations. I conclude by reflecting on the ethical dilemmas of encountering animals in research and discuss ways for moving forward. In doing this, I argue that a responsible practicing of multispecies participant observation can foster meaningful human-animal connections that can, in turn, politically and ethically transform the way we live together.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account
Monograph Book