This paper seeks to understand why modern politics fails to implement an appropriate risk management approach to climate change. The paper draws attention to the proposition that risk management of the future requires not merely intervention in technological innovation and human behavioural practices but that more importantly, what is required is intervention from the political system. However, this change is unlikely to come because the dominant technological and individualistic understanding of global modernity render us incapable of unleashing the potential for change that is necessary in our political thinking and institutions. Moreover, political intervention is challenged by the fact that 'overburdened modern individuals' are incapable of participating in building the necessary new democratic and political institutions. This incapacity arises for the exact same reasons that these institutions are needed. Subsequent to this pessimistic conclusion, the paper identifies city governance, grassroots movements, and action research as possible spaces for optimism.
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your Elgar Online account
-
Front Matter
-
Part I: Urban climate vulnerability
-
Part II: Pioneer movements in city preparedness
-
Part III: Indicators and benchmarking
-
Part IV: Deep innovation and knowledge markets for city preparedness
-
Part V: Staying with urban trouble
-
Part VI: Urban futures
-
Part VII: Re-imagining the city
