One year in the position of deputy-mayor for urban planning in the city of Milan gave me the opportunity to look from inside what I normally used to study from outside. My academic background was relevant in different ways: it provided me with a deep knowledge of the city; it supported me in gaining recognition and trust from the Mayor and my colleagues; it helped me in using the typical academic technique of meeting with peers not to be overwhelmed by events. Beyond what was already defined, I took some new initiatives with the general objective of bringing quality projects in peripheral areas: selling public assets to reinvest in the periphery; organizing a task forces to develop priority projects; launching a co-planning initiative with internal municipal districts and external municipalities. I coped with issues of participation, conflicts and political controversies, holding that being equipped with sound planning theories is certainly helpful but does not prevent failure.
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your Elgar Online account
-
Front Matter
-
Part I: Introduction
-
Part II: National level
-
Part III: Regional level
-
Part IV: City level
-
Part V: Reflections and lessons learned
