Chapter 11: Unilateral sanctions as a challenge to the law of state responsibility
Restricted access

Within the decentralized international legal order, unilateral sanctions are considered one of the few lawful means of enforcement available to states and other members of the international community. The expectation is that autonomous sanctions are to be adopted in order to induce compliance with international obligations. On this assumption, international legal jurisprudence and doctrine have developed various theoretical categories of unilateral sanctions: acts of retorsion, internationally wrongful acts or (collective) countermeasures. Nonetheless, despite the discipline’s common understandings of enforcement through unilateral coercive sanctions, a closer look at what states do reveals a discrepancy between how states are expected to behave in theory and what states do in practice. This is most noticeable in applying the countermeasure framework to prima facie wrongful sanctions. This discrepancy is possibly explained by international law’s neglect of the punitive nature of sanctions, which runs counter to the principle of sovereign equality among states.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account