Chapter 41: Legal history and comparative law
Restricted access

‘Pour se disputer, il faut etre d’accord.’ It seems Plato was of the opinion that every discussion presupposes a mutual understanding of the main notions between the parties. Therefore we suggest that the concept of legal history be used in the sense of the Roman law tradition, which in itself is not only the local law of a small central Italian city-state of the early centuries of our era, but also the main source of medieval and later legal scholarship. The law school at Bologna became from the 12th century onwards the centre for the scholarly study of Roman law texts. Those who wished to make progress in literate employment obtained their education there. The link between law and public administration which remained strong in the continental European tradition began there. Although especially in the German tradition since the Historical School the curriculum has been divided into three parts, indigenous legal history, canon law and Roman law, it was specifically the latter branch of legal history which opened around the turn of the 19th and 20th century the gateway to the new discipline of comparative law.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account
Edited by Jan M. Smits