Chapter 44: Legal transplants*
Restricted access

While dating back to antiquity, ‘free trade in legal ideas’ (Kahn-Freund, 1974, p. 10) has increased dramatically over the past decades; borrowing from another system is today certainly ‘the most common form of legal change’ (Watson, 1991, p. 73). Many factors have contributed to this development. Prominent among them is the demise of Socialism in Eastern Europe towards the end of the 1980s and its various knock-on effects across the globe: the desire of many countries to join the European Union and to develop commercial relationships with the United States; the democratization of societies in parts of Africa and South America; the quest for free trade and internationally harmonized rules for the protection of intellectual property; and the worldwide trend towards greater recognition of human rights and the rule of law. All of this has favoured a spread of legal ideas regardless of political borders or cultural differences. It has also blurred the seemingly neat theoretical distinctions that have traditionally been drawn between various ‘legal families’ by comparatists in the second half of the 20th century – a phenomenon which is currently also beginning to affect the relationship between Islamic law and ‘western’ concepts of criminal, commercial, or family law as a consequence of what has become known as the Arab Spring.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account
Edited by Jan M. Smits