Key authors in business and management education (BME) with a bibliometric analysis of economic education scholarship by gender
Carlos J. Asarta University of Delaware, Delaware, USA

Search for other papers by Carlos J. Asarta in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Regina F. Bento University of Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by Regina F. Bento in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Zachary Ferrara Florida Atlantic University, Florida, USA

Search for other papers by Zachary Ferrara in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Charles J. Fornaciari LaSalle University, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for other papers by Charles J. Fornaciari in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Alvin Hwang Pace University, New York, USA

Search for other papers by Alvin Hwang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Kathy Lund Dean Gustavus Adolphus College, Minnesota, USA

Search for other papers by Kathy Lund Dean in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Diego Mendez-Carbajo Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for other papers by Diego Mendez-Carbajo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Category:
Research Article
Page Range:
45–68
Published:
02 Jun 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4337/aee.2023.01.04
Volume/Issue:
Volume 2: Issue 1
Keywords:
business and management education scholarship; author productivity; cross-disciplinary research; journal quality; bibliometric analysis; gender; A2; J1; O1
Restricted access
USD  $40.00
Click here to view the full Terms and Conditions

This study examines productivity in Business and Management Education (BME) scholarship, identifying the “top 96” BME authors of the last decade, extending the author productivity conversation initiated by Arbaugh et al. (2017), and exploring the degree to which women feature in the list. The rankings proved very dynamic: approximately 55% of the top-ranked authors are new to the list, with 38% of those authors being female. The BME field continues to offer opportunities for establishing a profile as a highly productive author, since barriers for entry into the list remain relatively low: five articles continue to be the threshold for inclusion. Accounting expanded its dominance over other disciplines, with the number of accounting education scholars ranked increasing from 28 to 34. The number of highly productive authors affiliated with institutions outside of the United States has increased significantly when compared to the 2005–2014 study, suggesting that the call for wider international participation in BME scholarship is beginning to produce movement. We document differences in the content of the scholarship produced by leading male and female authors in economic education, noting that those differences tend to blend when they work together.

Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: e-mail: asarta@udel.edu.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Purchase

Pay to Access Content (PDF download and unlimited online access)

USD  $40.00
Click here to view the full Terms and Conditions

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account
Cover Advances in Economics Education
Advances in Economics Education
Get eTOC Alerts
Get New Article Alerts
Redeem Token
Since 2022 Since May 2022 Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1850 1850 18
Full Text Views 6 6 0
PDF Downloads 11 11 1