The proportionality of merger remedies in differentiated product markets

Horizontal mergers that raise competition concerns may require divestitures that eliminate the identified concerns. At the same time, divestitures should be proportionate, not going above and beyond what is necessary to eliminate the identified concerns. In this article, we argue that in differentiated product markets out-of-market substitutes exert stronger competitive pressure on some products within the relevant product market than on others. As a result, a divestiture of products that are subject to strong competitive pressure from out-of-market substitutes may not be needed if other products that are subject to weaker competitive pressure are divested. A simplistic solution that requires divestitures in all areas of horizontal overlap could result in overly broad remedies that violate the proportionality principle.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Oliver März and Dr. Nicola Tosini are respectively Consultant and Director in the Antitrust and Competition Practice of NERA Economic Consulting Berlin, Germany. This work draws on their experience advising the merging parties in merger control proceedings before the European Commission. The opinions expressed reflect the authors’ views and do not necessarily reflect the views of their employer.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.


Pay to Access Content (PDF download and unlimited online access)

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account