‘For the trees have no tongues’: eco-feedback, speech, and the silencing of nature
  • 1 PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science, The University of Colorado at Boulder
  • | 2 Departments of Political Science and Environmental Studies, The University of Colorado at Boulder

When Christopher Stone argued for the extension of legal standing to natural objects, he proposed a guardianship model for representing the rights or interests of nonhuman nature. This approach requires that natural objects or systems be able to intelligibly communicate information regarding needs associated with their continued sustainable flourishing. Drawing upon both ‘law beyond the human’ approaches to legal theory and New Materialist theories about nonhuman subjectivity, we conceive of this mode of communication as a political speech act, albeit one that must be interpreted through eco-feedback collected in the study of natural systems rather than directly transmitted from speaker to listener. We then apply this conception of communication to human rights contexts in which efforts to distort or to otherwise manipulate this eco-feedback could be construed as an anti-democratic interference in speech rights, arguing for the extension of such rights to protect against such interference.

Contributor Notes

vanders@colorado.edu. The authors would like to thank the editorial staff at the Journal of Human Rights and the Environment – Anna Grear, Joshua Sterlin, and Emille Boulot, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and incisive comments.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Purchase

Pay to Access Content (PDF download and unlimited online access)

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account