This article examines whether the widely accepted political theory contributions on fair burden sharing, harm avoidance and a just distribution of the remaining carbon budget can (and ought to) be incorporated or reflected in judicial reasoning on causation in systemic rights-based climate litigation. It explores whether a wider use of the European Court of Human Rights’ lenient approach to causation at the national level could help overcome some of the causal difficulties that might otherwise excuse wealthy developed country governments that are signatories to the European Convention on Human Rights from responsibility. The article also considers how rights-based arguments might be a way of operationalizing climate justice in judicial reasoning in systemic rights-based climate cases in Europe.
Orla Kelleher is a PhD candidate at the UCD Sutherland School of Law and a Teaching Assistant at the University of Limerick. Her doctoral research was funded by an IRC Government of Ireland Postgraduate Scholarship. I would like to thank Dr Andrew Jackson, Prof Suzanne Kingston, Prof Eoin Carolan and Dr Alexa Zellentin for their comments on an earlier draft, and the two anonymous reviewers and the JHRE editors for their kind and helpful comments on the manuscript. Responsibility for any remaining shortcomings of style or substance are mine alone.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.
Pay to Access Content (PDF download and unlimited online access)