Standards for adjudicating the next generation of Urgenda-style climate cases
Lucy Maxwell*Senior Legal Associate at the Climate Litigation Network, a project of the Urgenda Foundation

Search for other papers by Lucy Maxwell* in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sarah Mead**Senior Legal Associate at the Climate Litigation Network, a project of the Urgenda Foundation

Search for other papers by Sarah Mead** in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Dennis van Berkel***Director of the Climate Litigation Network, Legal Counsel of the Urgenda Foundation

Search for other papers by Dennis van Berkel*** in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Over the past decade, legal norms governing States’ obligations to mitigate climate change, and courts’ review of such efforts, have matured greatly in many jurisdictions around the world. In this article, we examine judicial decisions and consider future developments in Urgenda-style, or ‘systemic mitigation cases’ as we define them, at the national level. Systemic mitigation cases seek to compel a State or one of its organs to increase its overall mitigation efforts. These cases, which are growing in number, can lead to a significant increase in a country’s overall mitigation ambition. Yet a perceived lack of standards by which to assess mitigation efforts has given rise to judicial concerns regarding the separation of powers in adjudicating such cases. In response to these concerns, we present a framework based on international climate change law and best available climate science to assist litigants and courts in human-rights- and tort-based cases. We draw on principles developed by the Dutch courts in Urgenda v the Netherlandsand on recent judgments of other national courts, and identify a range of concrete standards by which courts may assess whether a State has met the minimum legal requirements of its duty of care in the ‘next generation’ of systemic mitigation cases.

* lucy.maxwell@urgenda.nl

** sarah.mead@urgenda.nl

*** dennis.van.berkel@urgenda.nl

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Purchase

Pay to Access Content (PDF download and unlimited online access)

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account