The Herchel Smith Intellectual Property Lecture 2022*

The UK courts' striving for consistency with international decisions in patent law
Richard Meade A judge of the High Court of England and Wales

Search for other papers by Richard Meade in
Current site
Google Scholar
Restricted access

The Patents Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court (before that, the House of Lords) have all and for many years stressed the need for consistency with decisions of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO. They have also taken account of decisions of the national courts of other EPC member states on many occasions in pursuit of consistency, in relation to validity but also infringement. This lecture will consider: how this has been done; when it has worked well and less well; how it can and should work if the EPO (in particular) changes or develops its law differently from the UK; and how that fits with the law of precedent. It will also consider the issues that may arise with decisions under the UPC.

Contributor Notes

This lecture was given before the Enlarged Board of the EPO gave its decision in G2/21 and before the UPC Agreement entered into force on 1 June 2023

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.


Pay to Access Content (PDF download and unlimited online access)

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account
Since 2022 Since May 2022 Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 249 249 0
Full Text Views 615 615 262
PDF Downloads 273 273 33