The theory of global imbalances: mainstream economics vs structural Keynesianism*
  • 1 Senior Economic Policy Advisor, AFL-CIO, Washington, DC, USA

Prior to the 2008 financial crisis there was much debate about global trade imbalances. Prima facie, the imbalances seem a significant problem. However, acknowledging that would question mainstream economics’ celebratory stance toward globalization. That tension prompted an array of theories which explained the imbalances while retaining the claim that globalization is economically beneficial. This paper surveys those new theories. It contrasts them with the structural Keynesian explanation that views the imbalances as an inevitable consequence of neoliberal globalization. The paper also describes how globalization created a political economy that supported the system despite its proclivity to generate trade imbalances.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Purchase

Pay to Access Content (PDF download and unlimited online access)

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account
Since 2022 Since May 2022 Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 58 58 58
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
Restricted access
Restricted access
Restricted access

Aggregate demand, instability, and growth*

Steven M. Fazzari, Pietro E. Ferri, Edward G. Greenberg, and Anna Maria Variato

Citation Info