Browse by title

You are looking at 1-10 of 1,228 items :

  • Entrepreneurship x
  • All accessible content x
Clear All
This content is available to you

Marcela Ramírez Pasillas, Ethel Brundin and Magdalena Markowska

This content is available to you

Edited by Gregory M. Randolph, Michael T. Tasto and Robert F. Salvino Jr.

This content is available to you

Gregory M. Randolph

This content is available to you

Edited by Gregory M. Randolph, Michael T. Tasto and Robert F. Salvino Jr.

This content is available to you

Susana C. Santos, Craig Mitchell, Hans Landström, Alain Fayolle and António Caetano

This content is available to you

Edited by Gregory M. Randolph, Michael T. Tasto and Robert F. Salvino Jr.

This content is available to you

Cyrine Ben-Hafaïedh and Thomas M. Cooney

This content is available to you

Edited by Cyrine Ben-Hafaïedh and Thomas M. Cooney

This content is available to you

William B. Gartner, Bruce T. Teague, Ted Baker and R. Daniel Wadhwani

This chapter explores this question: What was known about “opportunity” before scholars began treating it as the “distinctive domain of entrepreneurship” (Shane and Venkataraman, 2000)? The chapter focuses on uncovering and recognizing a significant amount of past scholarship on opportunity that we suggest has value for helping entrepreneurship scholars, now, re-conceptualize the idea of opportunity as well as reformulate and contextualize methods and situations for studying opportunity as an aspect of entrepreneurship. We suggest that the concept of opportunity, historically, is much richer and more nuanced than is recognized in current scholarship. Second, there is a strong foundation of prior scholarship on the nature of opportunity from the strategic management area (e.g. Dutton and Jackson, 1987; Jackson and Dutton, 1988) that laid a strong foundation for any subsequent pursuit of opportunity as a subject of scholarship. Third, the idea of opportunity as a primary characteristic of entrepreneurship appears to have been first proposed by Stevenson (1983), and his subsequent work has, essentially, been ignored. We suggest that an ignorance of prior thought, theory and evidence has been detrimental to subsequent theory building and empirical research on the importance of opportunity as an idea that has value for understanding the nature of entrepreneurship. We offer some suggestions for how this prior research and theory might be fruitfully integrated into current scholarship on opportunity. Finally, we offer some thoughts for how a historical approach to entrepreneurship scholarship might be useful for informing the development of theory and practice.