Browse by title

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 179 items :

  • Finance and Banking Law x
  • Corporate Law and Governance x
Clear All
You do not have access to this content

Mateo Gargantini

The most recent developments in the legal framework for corporate governance increasingly focus on the monitoring role of shareholders and, more specifically, on their engagement with investee companies. These developments aim at reducing agency problems along the investment chain by enhancing equity investors' oversight and asset managers' accountability.

You do not have access to this content

Christopher Teichmann and Lothar Wolff

Shareholders are to a large extent investing in companies that are not governed by their own jurisdiction. Consequently, the enforcement of shareholders’ duties arising from national law frequently involves a cross-border element. This means that within the European Union, state measures regulating and enforcing shareholder duties will have to be assessed in the light of primary EU law, which affects practically all transnational economic activities in the Common Market.

You do not have access to this content

Christian A. Witting

There is intense debate in the European Union and beyond about the current responsibilities and potential liabilities of shareholders. This chapter argues for greater attention to be paid to the design of a liability regime that incen¬tivises all participants in corporate endeavours to take appropriate measures to avoid the causation of personal injuries. The appropriate liability regime should incentivise shareholders to undertake their statutorily assigned roles in the governance of investee companies - namely, through making proper appointments to corporate boards and undertaking proper monitoring of corporate risk-imposition. The chapter argues that the only incentive that is likely to ensure that shareholders do their part is a residual personal liability for unsatisfied personal injury claims.

You do not have access to this content

Corrado Malberti

To understand the scope and nature of the enforcement of shareholders’ duties, it is necessary to compare this type of enforcement with that of contracts and agreements shareholders may have concluded with companies or third parties. In some cases, contractual arrangements may reinforce shareholders’ duties by providing more effective remedies. In other circumstances, contracts may clarify what other shareholders or companies expect from a shareholder or introduce obligations in addition to those mandated by law. However, some¬times, contractual obligations may also conflict with shareholders’ duties and jeopardize the performance of such duties.

You do not have access to this content

Hanne S. Birkmose

Duties imposed on shareholders are no longer a rare and exotic phenomenon in European company and capital market law. Rather, they should be seen as a trend that has gained momentum since the financial crisis. Shareholders’ duties typically apply to all shareholders. However, the nature of the situation sometimes requires that duties be imposed on one or more shareholders. These duties apply to all shareholders in principle but it is a given situation that leads to imposing duties on some shareholders.

You do not have access to this content

Mette Neville and Karsten Engsig Sørenson

Recently, suspension of voting rights has been introduced in the European Union through Directive 2013/50/EU. According to the amended Transparency Directive, this sanction should be available to the relevant authorities in the Member States in case of infringements of the duty to notify major sharehold¬ings. The reason for introducing this sanction is that it is considered a particu¬larly effective sanction by the Commission. This raises the question why, and for which type of infringements, this sanction is effective. These questions will be analysed further in this chapter.

You do not have access to this content

Edited by Hanne S. Birkmose and Konstantinos Sergakis

A heavily debated topic, the evolution of shareholders’ duties risks the transformation of the very concept of shareholder primacy, crucially associated with shareholder rights. Offering a distinctive and comprehensive examination of both current and forthcoming enforcement mechanisms in the area of shareholder duties, this timely book provides an exhaustive analysis of the many issues related to these mechanisms, and considers the ongoing challenges surrounding their implementation.
You do not have access to this content

Jennifer Payne and Elizabeth Howell

The focus in company law has traditionally been on shareholders’ rights rather than shareholders’ duties. While some forms of shareholders’ duties have existed for many years, this is an issue that has come to greater prominence recently. This is due to a number of factors, including a growing recognition of the need to hold institutional investors accountable to their underlying inves¬tors, a trend that is evident in recent amendments to the Shareholder Rights Directive,1 and also a recognition that corporations, and by extension their shareholders, should be held more accountable for the effect they have on soci¬etal issues such as environmental matters.

This content is available to you

Edited by Hanne S. Birkmose and Konstantinos Sergakis

This content is available to you

Hanne S. Birkmose and Konstantinos Sergakis

The discussion on shareholders’ duties has increasingly gained momentum in the EU and has given rise to the adoption of duties in both company law and capital markets law. However, this discussion must be extended further if the duties that are increasingly imposed on shareholders are to have a genuine effect on the viability of the recent regulatory developments in this area.