Browse by title

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 80 items :

  • Law of Obligations x
  • Comparative Law x
Clear All
You do not have access to this content

John O. Haley

You do not have access to this content

John O. Haley

You do not have access to this content

John O. Haley

As cross-border transactions expand in our contemporary global economy, the significance of comparative contract law is evermore apparent. In addition the role of lawyers in transactional counselling as well as dispute resolution has become increasingly prominent. Appreciation of the principal similarities and differences between the two major subdivisions of Common Law (the United States and the British Commonwealth) and Civil Law (French versus German law) has thus become imperative. This Research Review endeavours to facilitate such appreciation and will prove an essential reference point for students, researchers and policymakers.
This content is available to you

John O. Haley

You do not have access to this content

The work/personal interface

A Comparative Study

Gordon Anderson, Douglas Brodie and Joellen Riley

The employee’s ability to maintain an autonomous private life alongside employment has long been contested territory in employment law. The rights to paid and unpaid leave to attend to illness and emergencies, and to undertake caring responsibilities and recreation, are the fruits of earlier industrial struggles; and where these rights appear in employment contracts, it is generally as a consequence of the influence of mandatory provisions in statutes or statutory instruments. Claims that employers must also accommodate an employee’s freedom of expression have also been contentious. This chapter considers the interplay of common law and statutory influences in establishing contemporary boundaries between work and personal life. Keywords comparative employment law, contract of employment, work and personal life, freedom of employee expression

You do not have access to this content

Statutory and incorporated terms

A Comparative Study

Gordon Anderson, Douglas Brodie and Joellen Riley

This chapter considers the extent to which provisions arising from a range of sources have influenced employment contract terms. This includes terms and conditions that have been established through processes of collective bargaining and also codes of conduct and ‘human resources’ policies that commonly govern employment practices in large enterprises in order to manage compliance with statutory obligations, for instance obligations to provide procedural fairness in disciplinary proceedings. A contemporary challenge for employment law is managing an expectation of ‘coherence’ between the demands of statutory regulation and the principles of common law. Keywords comparative employment law, employee, contract of employment, terms and conditions, law and human resources,

You do not have access to this content

Security in employment

A Comparative Study

Gordon Anderson, Douglas Brodie and Joellen Riley

This chapter considers the extent to which employees in the three countries enjoy security in their employment and, in particular, protection against unjustified dismissal. Prior to unfair dismissal legislation, employees were subject to arbitrary dismissal at any time. The introduction of unfair dismissal legislation was an important turning point in the balance between the common law and statute, and between employers and employees allowing the courts to intervene in an employer’s management of its employees. This chapter identifies the key legislative characteristics of unfair dismissal protection in each jurisdiction, evaluates the extent to which the common law approach to dismissal influences the statutory regimes and examines the current relationship between the common law and the statutory schemes. Keywords comparative employment law, contract of employment, unfair dismissal, employment security

This content is available to you

Introduction

A Comparative Study

Gordon Anderson, Douglas Brodie and Joellen Riley

The introduction takes up David Marsden’s argument that the rise of the modern business enterprise relies on two great innovations: limited liability and the contract of employment. It outlines the authors’ objective to analyse the character of the contract of employment in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand and to examine the interrelationship between the contract of employment and the political, economic and social dynamics that have shaped the employment environment in each jurisdiction. Keywords comparative employment law, contract of employment

You do not have access to this content

Gordon Anderson, Douglas Brodie and Joellen Riley

This chapter explores the interrelationship of the implied terms of fidelity and mutual trust and confidence and related obligations. A characteristic of employment law is the role played by the common law implied terms in all contracts of employment, most significantly the undefined and open-ended implied obligation of fidelity, that restrain an employee’s autonomy by requiring them to subordinate many of their own interests to those of their employer. Until recently, an employer did not owe any reciprocal duty; but the development of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence and, more recently, the potential development of good faith obligations in the general law of contract generally have slowly changed that picture. Elements of commonality exist which may help to identify emerging core values of the employment contract, as norms of good faith and fair dealing become more significant in the law of contract as a whole. Keywords comparative employment law, contract of employment, mutual trust and confidence, good faith

You do not have access to this content

Gordon Anderson, Douglas Brodie and Joellen Riley

This chapter considers the risk to the employee that the employer will abuse their superior bargaining power to dictate terms, or manage the employment relationship, in a way that imposes an undue or oppressive burden on the employee. Employees accepting indefinite engagement in an enterprise often commit to the development of their own ‘human capital’ – their knowledge, skills and relationships – in the best interests of the employer’s enterprise. The chapter explores the techniques by which the common law of employment has mitigated the risk of unfair bargains, and of capricious and arbitrary exercise of the employer’s powers of management focussing principally on the development of principles of contract interpretation and construction that favour restraint on the capricious exercise of discretion. Keywords comparative employment law, contract of employment, allocation of risk, unfair contractual terms