Chapter 7: Heterodox economics
Open access

Orthodox economics corresponds to the formal definition of economy, according to which scarcity determines the relationships between means and ends. A heterodox economic framework is provided by substantive economics; this theoretical approach introduced by Karl Polanyi replaces the focus on the market with an openness to the plurality of economic principles including: Redistribution, according to which central authority is responsible for allocating what is produced, which presupposes procedures defining the rules of levy and their use - a relation has become established over time between the central authority that imposes an obligation and the agents who submit to it; Reciprocity, corresponding to relations established between groups or persons through actions that only make sense insofar as they express a will to demonstrate a social link among the stakeholders, the cycle of reciprocity contrasts with market exchange in that the former is inseparable from human relations involving the desire for recognition and power - Reciprocity also differs from redistribution, insofar as it is not imposed by a central authority; Householding, which does not involve relations between groups but concerns the basic group in the society under consideration (the oikos, the nuclear family, etc.), it refers to the production and sharing that takes place within this group in order to satisfy its members' needs. This pluralist approach emphasizes the process of disembedding through which public authorities promote the formal economy while hiding this support through the naturalization of the self-regulating market. By destroying social bonds and exercising violence towards nature, this disembedding threatens the substance of society. For this reason, disembedding generates a need for re-embedding, but this can take two directions: one authoritarian, the other emancipatory. Crises - dangerous periods - are at once fraught with the risk of totalitarian regression and charged with democratic potential. On an epistemological level, substantive economics also converges with feminist analyses questioning the reductionism of formal economics, which values production and neglects reproduction.

  • Bélanger, Paul R. and Lévesque, Beno√Æt. 1990. La Théorie de la régulation. Du rapport salarial au rapport de consommation. Montréal: UQAM.

  • Boltanski, Luc and Laurent Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Coraggio, José-Luis. 2015. 'L'économie Sociale et Solidaire et Son Institutionnalisation En Amérique Latine: Cinq Pays, Cinq Processus.' Revue Française de Socio-√âconomie 15 (1): 233.

  • Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. 'The Strength of Weak Ties.' American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–80.

  • Hollingsworth, J. Rogers and Robert Boyer. 1997. Contemporary Capitalism. The Embeddeness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Laville, Jean-Louis. 2023. The Solidarity Economy. University of Minnesota Press.

  • Mauss, Marcel. 1997. Ecrits politiques. Paris: Fayard.

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Polanyi, Karl. 1945. Origins of Our Time: The Great Transformation. London: Victor Gollancz.

  • Polanyi, Karl. 2008. Essais. Paris: Seuil.

  • Polanyi, Karl. 2011. La Subsistance de 'Homme – la Place de l'√âconomie dans l'Histoire et la Société. Paris: Flammarion.

  • Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. London: Routledge.

  • Verschuur, Christine, Isabelle Guérin and Isabelle Hillenkamp, eds. 2021. Social Reproduction, Solidarity Economy, Feminisms and Democracy: Latin America and India. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.