Cognitive science has identified several models of mind and cognitive processes that underpin thinking and decision-making. Understanding and working with these processes will improve the efficacy of scanning, foresight, and vision-building. These cognitive devices include mental models (internalized system maps), mental simulations (for scenario development and testing), inference processes (that explore implications), and assumptions (that summarize and consolidate thinking). This chapter describes the cognitive science behind these processes and suggests how we might use them in foresight. Integrating an understanding of cognitive processes in foresight practice will change foresight methods. It also has implications for ownership, trust, participation, and the impact of foresight on decision-making and public policy. The observations and hypotheses grow out of my experience conducting hundreds of foresight projects involving several thousand people in a public policy context. While many of these insights are likely familiar to most futurists, they are rarely explicitly acknowledged or fully utilized.
-
APA. (2023, 23 July). Chunking. In APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/chunking.
-
Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational learning. Allyn & Bacon.
-
Assumption. (2023, 4 August) in Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/assumption. Accessed 19 August 2023.
-
Badcock, P.B., Friston, K.J., Ramstead, M.J., Ploeger, A., & Hohwy, J. (2019). The hierarchically mechanistic mind: An evolutionary systems theory of the human brain, cognition, and behavior. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19, 1319–51. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00721-3.
-
Dance, C.J., Ipser, A., & Simner, J. (2022). The prevalence of aphantasia (imagery weakness) in the general population. Consciousness and Cognition, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103243.
-
Doyle, E.E., Harrison, S.E., Hill, S.R., Williams, M., Paton D., & Bostrom, A. (2022). Eliciting mental models of science and risk for disaster communication: A scoping review of methodologies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103084.
-
Escalas, J.E. (2004). Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37–48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4189256. Accessed 19 August 2023.
-
Goldvarg, E., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (2001). Naive causality: A mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 565–610. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2504_3.
-
Grandin, T. (2006). Thinking in pictures. Vintage Books.
-
Grandin, T. (2022). Visual thinking: The hidden gifts of people who think in pictures, patterns, and abstractions. Riverhead Books.
-
Gureckis, T.M. (2021). Mental imagery, mental simulation, and mental rotation [Course book]. Lab in Cognition and Perception, New York University. https://cims.nyu.edu/~brenden/courses/labincp/chapters/16/00-mentalsimulation.html. Accessed 19 August 2023.
-
Hagger, M., & Conroy, D. (2020). Imagery, visualization, and mental simulation interventions. In M. Hagger, L. Cameron, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen, & T. Lintunen (Eds.), The handbook of behavior change (pp. 479–94). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.033.
-
Inayatullah, S. (2004). Causal layered analysis: An integrative and transformative theory and method. In Sohail Inayatullah (Ed.), The causal layered analysis reader. Tamkang University Publications. https://www.metafuture.org/library1/causal_layered_analysis_intro_chapter_reader_2004.pdf.
-
Inference. (2023, 28 May). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inference&oldid=1157405574z. Accessed 19 August 2023.
-
Johnson-Laird, P. (2008). Intuitions and unconscious reasoning. In How we reason (pp. 60–72). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551330.003.0005.
-
Jones, N.A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268859.
-
Mumford, Michael D., & Standish, Collen J. (2020). Mental models. Encyclopedia of creativity (3rd edn, pp. 121–6). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23854-6.
-
Rothman, J. (2023, 16 January). How should we think about our different styles of thinking? The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/01/16/how-should-we-think-about-our-different-styles-of-thinking. Accessed 19 August 2023.
-
Van den Broek, K.L., Luomba, J., van den Broek, J., & Fischer, H. (2023). Content and complexity of stakeholders’ mental models of socio-ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101906.
