The concept of frugal innovation tends to be exclusively related to capitalism and modernity. The authors argue that this is a limited perspective. The chapter explores its paradigmatic role in history by focusing on ‘Greco-Roman Antiquity’ (roughly 500 BCE - 500 CE), a period characterized by rapid change and enduring innovations. The concept of anchoring - the effective integration and accommodation of the new in existing conceptual categories for relevant social groups - is introduced to the conceptual toolbox of the study of frugal innovation. With a historical perspective on what innovation entails, it becomes clear that redesigning and ‘good-enough’ solutions are what probably drives innovation and its diffusion throughout history. In fact, therefore, the alternative perspective that needs explanation is not the ‘frugal’ one, but rather the (ahistorical and typically Western) idea that innovation is about linear economic growth enabled by unlimited resources. The present turn to frugal innovation is therefore better understood as a return to frugal innovation.
Appadurai, A. (2013), The Future as Cultural Fact. Essays on the Global Condition. London & New York: Verso.
Baloglou, C.P. (2003), ‘Schumpeter’s gap and the economic thought in Hellenistic times.’ In: J. Backhaus (ed.), Joseph Alois Schumpeter. Entrepreneurship, Style and Vision. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 327–335.
Bhatti, Y. (2012), ‘What is Frugal, What is Innovation? Towards a Theory of Frugal Innovation’. Working Paper at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2005910
Blok, J. (2017), Citizenship in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bocken, N.M.P., A. Fil, and J. Prabhu (2016), ‘Scaling up social businesses in developing markets’. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 295–308.
Bowman, A.K. and A. Wilson (eds) (2009), Quantifying the Roman Economy: Methods and Problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brandon, C.J., M.D. Jackson, J.P. Oleson, et al. (2014), Building for eternity. The history and technology of Roman concrete engineering in the sea. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Brysbaert, A. (2007), ‘Cross-craft and cross-cultural interactions during the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean Late Bronze Age’. In S. Antoniadou and A. Pace (eds), Mediterranean Crossroads. Athens: Pierides Foundation, pp. 325–359.
Büntgen, U., W. Tegel, K. Nicolussi, M. McCormick, D. Frank, V. Trouet, et al. (2011), ‘2500 Years of European Climate Variability and Human Susceptibility’. Science, 331, 578–582.
Calandra, E. (1998), ‘Stesse forme, materie diverse: spunti di discussione per l’età ellenistica e romana’. In: Il vetro dall’antichità all’età contemporanea: aspetti tecnologici, funzionali e commerciali. Giornate Nazionali di Studio. Milano: Il Comune di Milano, Settore Cultura e Musei, Civiche Raccolte Archeologiche a Cernusco sul Naviglio, pp. 87–92.
D’Angour, A. (2011), The Greeks and the New. Novelty in Ancient Greek Imagination and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Massis, A., F. Frattini, J. Kotlar, A. Messeni Petruzelli, and M. Wright (2016), ‘Innovation through tradition: lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research’. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30, 93–116.
Devi, W.P., and H. Kumar (2017), ‘Frugal innovations and Actor-Network Theory’. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(1), 66–83.
Duncan-Jones, R. (1990), Structure and Scale in the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erdkamp, P. (2005), The Grain Market in the Roman Empire. A Social, Political and Economic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Finley, M.I. (1965), ‘Technical innovation and economic progress in the ancient world’. The Economic History Review, 18(1), 29–45.
Finley, M.I. (1999), The Ancient Economy, 2nd edn, originally published in 1973. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Flohr, M. (2016), ‘Innovation and society in the Roman world’. Oxford Handbooks Online.
Garrard, G. (ed.) (2014), The Oxford Handbook of Ecocriticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Geerts, R.C.A. (2020), Colour-coded for your convenience. Skeumorphism in Roman pottery production in Germania Inferior. In C. Viegas (ed.), Rei Cretariæ Romanæ Fautorum Acta 46. Congressus Tricesimus Primus Rei Cretariæ Romanæ Fautorum. Napocæ Habitus. MMXVIII. Oxford, 475–480.
Geerts, R.C.A., E. Hartoch, S. Rekk, F. Vilvorder, and J. Yans (2016), ‘From clay to container. Roman pottery production at the Beukenbergweg, Tongeren (Belgium)’, RCRF Acta, 44, 341–349.
Goody, J. (2006), The Theft of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greene, K. (2000), ‘Technological innovation and economic progress in the ancient world: M.I. Finley reconsidered’. The Economic History Review,53(1), 29–59.
Gupta, A.K. (2016), ‘Grassroots Innovation. Minds on the Margin are not Marginal Minds’. India: Penguin Random House.
Hodder, I. (2012), Entangled. An Archaeology of the Relationship between Humans and Things. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hodder, I. (2018), Where are We Heading? The Evolution of Humans and Things. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Hong, S., J.P. Candelone, C.C. Patterson, and C.F. Boutron (1994), ‘Greenland ice evidence of hemispheric lead pollution two millennia ago by Greek and Roman civilizations’. Science, 265(5180), 1841–1843.
Hughes, J.D. (2014), Environmental Problems of the Greeks and Romans, 2nd edn. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ingham, P.C. (2015), The Medieval New. Ambivalence in an Age of Innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Jackson, M.D., S.R. Mulcahy, H. Chen, Y. Li, Q. Li, P. Cappelletti, and H.-R. Wenk (2017), ‘Phillipsite and Al-tobermorite mineral cements produced through low-temperature water-rock reactions in Roman marine concrete’. American Mineralogist, 102(7), 1435–1450.
Kay, P. (2014), Rome’s Economic Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knappett, C. and S. van der Leeuw (2014), ‘A developmental approach to ancient innovation: The potter’s wheel in the Bronze Age east Mediterranean’. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(1), 64–92.
Lamers, H. and B.L. Reitz-Joosse (2017), The Codex Fori Mussolini. A Latin text of Italian fascism. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Latour, B. (1986), ‘The powers of association’. In J. Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 264–280.
Lehoux, D. (2012), What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lo Cascio, E. (ed.) (2006), Innovazione technica e progresso economico nel mondo romano. Bari: Edipuglia.
McConnell, J.R., A.I. Wilson, A. Stohl, M.M. Arienzo, N.J. Chellman, S. Eckhardt, E.M. Thompson, A.M. Pollard, and J.P. Steffensen (2018), ‘Lead pollution recorded in Greenland ice indicates European emissions tracked plagues, wars, and imperial expansion during antiquity’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, May 2018, 115(22), 5726–5731 (https://www.pnas.org/content/115/22/5726, last accessed 21 September 2019).
McNeill, J.R. (2010), Mosquito Empires: Ecology and Warfare in the Greater Caribbean, 1620-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manning, S. (2013), ‘The Roman world and climate: Context, relevance of climate change, and some issues’. In W.V. Harris et al. (eds), The Ancient Mediterranean Environment Between Science and History. Leiden: Brill, pp. 103–170.
Manning, J.G. (2018), The Open Sea. The Economic Life of the Ancient Mediterranean World from the Iron Age to the Rise of Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Miller, M.C. (1997), Athens and Persia in the Fifth Century. A Study in Cultural Receptivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, reprinted 2004.
Mogetta, M. (2015), ‘A new date for concrete in Rome’. Journal of Roman Studies, 105, 1–40.
Morris, I., R.P. Saller, and W. Scheidel (2007), ‘Introduction’. In W. Scheidel, I. Morris, and R.P. Saller (eds), The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–12.
Morris, I. (1999), ‘Foreword’ (to the updated edition). In: M.I. Finley (ed.) The Ancient Economy. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. ix–xxxvi, 2nd edition.
Naerebout, F.G., and H. Singor (2014), Antiquity. Greeks and Romans in Context, Malden & Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
North, D.C. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Perlman, M. (1996), ‘Introduction’. In J.A. Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis. With a New Introduction by Mark Perlman. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Pitts, M., and M.J. Versluys (eds) (2015), Globalisation and the Roman World. World History, Connectivity and Material Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prabhu, J. (2017), ‘Frugal innovation: doing more with less for more’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 375, 20160372, pp. 1–22.
Radjou, N., J. Prabhu, and S. Ahuja (2012), Jugaad Innovation: Think Frugal, be Flexible, Generate Breakthrough Growth. John Wiley & Sons.
Rogers, E.M. (2003), Diffusion of Innovations, New York: Free Press.
Rostovtzeff, M. (1926), The Social and Economic History of the Roman Empire. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Schubert, C. (2017), ‘Innovation minus modernity? Revisiting some relations of technical and social change’. In P.W. Stockhammer and J. Maran (eds), Appropriating Innovations. Entangled Knowledge in Eurasia, 5000 – 1500 BC. Oxford & Philadelphia: Oxbow, Chapter 2.
Sluiter, I. (2017), ‘Anchoring Innovation. A classical research agenda’. European Review, 25, 20–38.
Sommer, M. (2013), Wirtschaftsgeschichte der Antike. München: beck.
Strootman, R., and M.J. Versluys (eds) (2017), Persianism in Antiquity. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Van Oyen, A. (2017), ‘Finding the material in ‘material culture’. Form and matter in Roman concrete’. In A. Van Oyen and M. Pitts (eds), Materialising Roman Histories. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 133–152.
Vennarucci, R.G., A. Van Oyen, and G. Tol (2018), ‘Una comunità artigianale nella Toscana rurale: il sito di Marzuolo’. In V. Nizzo and A. Pizzo (eds), Antico e non antico. Scritti multidisciplinari offerti a Giuseppe Pucci. Milano: Mimesis.
Vickers, M. (1998), Skeuomorphismus oder die Kunst, aus wenig viel zu Machen. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.
Webster, J. (2008), ‘Less beloved. Roman archaeology, slavery, and the failure to compare’. Archaeological Dialogues, 15(2), 103–123.
Wilson, A. (2002), ‘Machines, power and the ancient economy’. Journal of Roman Studies, 92, 1–32.
Ziman, J. (ed.) (2000), Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Front Matter
-
Part I: INCLUDING FRUGAL INNOVATION THINKING IN DISCIPLINARY DEBATES
-
Part II: EMBEDDING FRUGAL INNOVATION IN TRANSDISCIPLINARY THEMATIC DEBATES
-
Part III: TECHNOLOGY AS AN ENABLER
-
Part IV: ACTORS, BUSINESS MODELS AND BLURRING BOUNDARIES
-
Back Matter
