In this chapter we outline major instances of environmental activism and advocacy in Europe in recent years in the context of a longer history of waves of environmentalism. This situated account points to a fairly clear (though not necessarily formal) demarcation of roles in EU environmentalism where social movements push for change through activist strategies that target governments at various levels, and NGOs use advocacy strategies initially to push for changes in EU policy and subsequently to monitor compliance and implementation. We also explore nuances, discussing how advocacy and activism overlap, take more and less prominent positions, and link general shifts from advocacy to activism to new actors, frames of understanding, and political developments. Advocacy and activist ‘modes’ thus emerge clearly as strategic choices. Certain tactics are favoured when deemed more effective for achieving influence, though this does not mean that others disappear: rather, they take a backseat.

  • Agyeman, J. et al. (2016). Trends and directions in environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41 (1): 1543–5938. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090052.

  • Bailey, D. J. et al. (2017). Beyond Defeat and Austerity. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Berny, N. and C. Rootes (2018). Environmental NGOs at a crossroads? Environmental Politics, 27 (6): 947–972. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1536293.

  • Bieler, A. (2021). Fighting for Water. London: Zed Books.

  • Biliouri, D. (1999). Environmental NGOs in Brussels. Environmental Politics, 8(2): 173–182. doi:10.1080/09644019908414472.

  • Börzel, T. A. and A. Buzogány (2019). Compliance with EU environmental law. The iceberg is melting. Environmental Politics, 28 (2): 315–341. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1549772.

  • Bosi, L., M. Giugni and K. Uba (Eds.) (2016). The Consequences of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316337790.

  • Briscoe, F. and A. Gupta (2016). Social activism in and around organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10 (1): 671–727. doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1153261.

  • Bunea, A. (2013). Issues, preferences and ties: determinants of interest groups’ preference attainment in the EU environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 20 (4): 552–570. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.726467.

  • Burns, C., P. Eckersley and P. Tobin (2020). EU environmental policy in times of crisis, Journal of European Public Policy, 27 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1561741.

  • Choudry, A. and D. Kapoor (2013). NGOization. London: Zed Books.

  • Crespy, A. and L. Parks (2017). The connection between parliamentary and extra-parliamentary opposition in the EU. Journal of European Integration, 39 (4): 453–467. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1309038.

  • Devaney, L. et al. (2020). Ireland’s citizens’ assembly on climate change. Environmental Communication, 14 (2): 141–146. doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1708429.

  • Dryzek, J. S. and H. Stevenson (2011). Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecological Economics, 70 (11): 1865–1874. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.021.

  • Dür, A. and G. Mateo (2016). Insiders versus Outsiders: Interest Group Politics in Multilevel Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • ETUC (2020). Just Transition Mechanism: ETUC comment. 14 January. www.etuc.org/en/pressrelease/just-transition-mechanism-etuc-comment.

  • Eurobarometer (2021). Special Eurobarometer 513 – Climate Change, European Commission. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2273.

  • European Commission (2015). European Environmental and Climate NGOs – LIFE Operating Grants 2015. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/life/publications/lifepublications/ngos/documents/ngo_compi15.pdf.

  • European Commission (2017). EU Law: Better Results Through Better Application. 2017/C 18/02, 19 January.

  • Friends of the Earth Europe (2012). Victory for German local group as airport expansion stopped. https://friendsoftheearth.eu/news/victory-for-german-local-group-as-airport-expansion-stopped/.

  • Gabor, D. (2020) The European Green Deal will bypass the poor and go straight to the rich. The Guardian, 19 February. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/feb/19/european-green-deal-polish-miners.

  • Giraudet, L.-G. et al. (2021). Deliberating on climate action: insights from the French citizens’ convention for climate. hal-03119539.

  • Giugni, M. and M. T. Grasso (2015). Environmental movements in advanced industrial democracies. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40 (1): 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021327.

  • Gravey, V. and A. Jordan (2016). Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Journal of European Public Policy, 23 (8): 1180–1198. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1186208.

  • Greenwood, J. (2017). Interest Representation in the European Union. Fourth Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Hadden, J. (2015). Networks in Contention. The Divisive Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hagedorn, G., et al. (2019) Concerns of young protesters are justified. Science 364 (6436): 139–140. Doi:10.1126/science.aax3807.

  • Hallstrom, L. K. (2004). Eurocratising enlargement? EU elites and NGO participation in European environmental policy. Environmental Politics, 13 (1): 175–193. doi:10.1080/09644010410001685191.

  • Hofmann, A. (2019). Left to interest groups? On the prospects for enforcing environmental law in the European Union, Environmental Politics, 28 (2): 342–364. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1549778.

  • Jenkins, K. (2018). Energy justice, energy democracy, and sustainability. In J. Lowitzsch (Ed.), Energy Transition: Financing Consumer Ownership in Renewables, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 79–97.

  • Junk, W. M. (2016). Two logics of NGO advocacy. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(2): 236–254. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1041416.

  • Kaldor, M. (2003). The idea of global civil society. International Affairs, 79(3): 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00324.

  • Keane, J. (2003). Global Civil Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Keck, M. E. and K. Sikkink (1998). Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Kenis, A. (2019). Post-politics contested: Why multiple voices on climate change do not equal politicisation. Environment and Planning C, 37 (5): 831–848. doi:10.1177/0263774X18807209.

  • Kettnaker, V. (2001). The European conflict over genetically engineered crops, 1995–1997. In D. Imig, D. and S. Tarrow (Eds.), Contentious Europeans. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 143–161.

  • Kitschelt, H. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest. British Journal of Political Science, 16 (1): 57–85. doi:10.1017/S000712340000380X.

  • Krick, E. (2021). Dealing with the epistemic-democratic tension in policy-making. Political Research Exchange, 3 (1): 1893608. doi:10.1080/2474736X.2021.1893608.

  • Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27 (4): 712–732. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411.

  • Machin, A. (2019). Changing the story? The discourse of ecological modernisation in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 28 (2): 208–227. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1549780.

  • McAdam, D., S. Tarrow and C. Tilly (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • de Moor J., et al. (Eds) (2020). Protest for a future II: composition, mobilization and motives of the participants in Fridays for Future climate protests on 20–27 September, 2019. https://osf.io/asruw/?fbclid=IwAR0N0uOHF_qV1KGY_2W0lJ2r3tXRCrzCIaq6K9_kRapmhsJzVraHvRrT_es.

  • de Moor J., et al. (2021). New kids on the block: taking stock of the recent cycle of climate activism. Social Movement Studies, 20 (5): 619–625. doi:10.1080/14742837.2020.1836617.

  • Moore, B., and Jordan, A. (2020). Disaggregating the dependent variable in policy feedback research: an analysis of the EU Emissions Trading System. Policy Sci 53: 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09377-0.

  • Parks, L. (2015). Social Movement Campaigns on EU Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • della Porta, D. (2022). Contentious Politics in Emergency Critical Juncture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • della Porta, D., et al. (2017). Movement Parties Against Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • della Porta, D. et al. (2006). Globalization from Below. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

  • della Porta, D. and G. Piazza (2007). Local contention, global framing. Environmental Politics 16: 864–882. Doi: 10.1080/09644010701634257.

  • della Porta, D. and L. Parks (2014). Framing processes in the climate movement. In M. Dietz and H. Garrelts (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Climate Change Movements. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 19–30.

  • della Porta, D. and M. Fabbri (2016). Producing space in action. Social Movement Studies, 15 (2): 180–196. Doi: 10.1080/14742837.2016.1144506.

  • della Porta, D. and M. Portos (2021). Rich kids of Europe? Social basis and strategic choices in the climate activism of Fridays for Future. Italian Political Science Review, pp. 1–26. doi:10.1017/ipo.2021.54.

  • Rootes C. (2004). Environmental movements. In D. A. Snow, S. Soule and H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 608–640.

  • Ruzza, C. (2004). Europe and Civil Society. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Ruzza, C., C. Berti and P. Cossarini (Eds.) (2021). The Impact of Populism on European Institutions and Civil Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Samper, J., A. Schockling and M. Islar (2021). Climate politics in green deals: exposing the political frontiers of the European Green Deal, Politics and Governance, 9 (2): 8–16. doi: 10.17645/pag.v9i2.3853.

  • Stephens, J. C. (2019). Energy democracy. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 61 (2): 4–13. doi: 10.1080/00139157.2019.1564212.

  • Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Thomas, A. (2021) ‘Heart of steel’: how trade unions lobby the European Union over emissions trading. Environmental Politics, 30 (7): 1217–1236. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2021.1871812.

  • Togami, C. and S. Staggenborg (2019). New hope for climate activism. Mobilizing Ideas, 15 March 2019. https://mobilizingideas.wordpress.com/2019/03/15/new-hope-for-climate-activism/.

  • Tosun, J., J. Pollex and L. Crumbie (2023). European climate pact citizen volunteers: strategies for deepening engagement and impact. Policy Design and Practice, DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2023.2199961

  • Wahlström, M., et al. (Eds.) (2019). Protest for a future: composition, mobilization and motives of the participants in Fridays for Future climate protests on 15 March 2019 in 13 European cities. https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/283193.

  • Wurzel, R. K. W., J. Conelly and D. Liefferink (Eds.) (2017). The European Union in International Climate Change Politics: Still Taking a Lead? Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Zamponi, L., A. C. Baukloh, N. Bertuzzi, D. Chironi, D. della Porta and M. Portos (2022). (Water) bottles and (street) barricades: the politicisation of lifestyle-centred action in youth climate strike participation, Journal of Youth Studies, doi: 10.1080/13676261.2022.2060730.