Transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly acknowledged as vital to addressing sustainability challenges for their ability to co-produce knowledge and generate transformative approaches. To overcome the fundamental differences in the shared generation and interpretation of knowledge between academia and actors outside the academic system, researchers and practitioners need to carefully consider the mutual design of ‘transformative spaces’. These spaces are collaborative environments that allow for transformative experimentation and ‘enable dialogue, reflection in action and reflexive learning’ towards transformative change. In this chapter, we unpack the notion of ‘transformative space’ by setting out key principles for its design and impact orientation. We focus on the three principles of (i) acknowledging context sensitivity, (ii) creating a safe space, and (iii) enabling transformative impact. We illustrate the principles in action based on a transdisciplinary case example conducted in different Global South contexts: The T-GroUP project. The case makes also clear how the design of transformative spaces calls for more awareness towards decolonised perspectives in transdisciplinary research.

  • Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., von Wehrden, H., Abernethy, P., Ives, C. D., Jager, N. W., & Lang, D. J. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y

  • Bergmann, M., Schäpke, N., Marg, O., Stelzer, F., Lang, D. J., Bossert, M., Gantert, M., Häußler, E., Marquardt, E., Piontek, F. M., Potthast, T., Rhodius, R., Rudolph, M., Ruddat, M., Seebacher, A., & Sußmann, N. (2021). Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: Success factors and methods for change. Sustainability Science, 16(2), 541-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00886-8

  • Blythe, J., Nash, K., Yates, J., & Cumming, G. (2017). Feedbacks as a bridging concept for advancing transdisciplinary sustainability research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.004

  • Blythe, J., Silver, J., Evans, L., Armitage, D., Bennett, N. J., Moore, M.-L., Morrison, T. H., & Brown, K. (2018). The dark side of transformation: Latent risks in contemporary sustainability discourse. Antipode, 50(5), 1206-1223. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12405

  • Brandt, P., Ernst, A., Gralla, F., Luederitz, C., Lang, D. J., Newig, J., Reinert, F., Abson, D. J., & von Wehrden, H. (2013). A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics, 92, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008

  • Caniglia, G., Luederitz, C., von Wirth, T., Fazey, I., Martín-López, B., Hondrila, K., König, A., von Wehrden, H., Schäpke, N. A., Laubichler, M. D., & Lang, D. J. (2020). A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 4, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00616-z

  • Charli-Joseph, L., Siqueiros-Garcia, J. M., Eakin, H., Manuel-Navarrete, D., & Shelton, R. (2018). Promoting agency for socio-ecological transformation: A transformation-lab in the Xochimilco socio-ecological system. Ecology and Society, 23(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10214-230246

  • Clark, W. C., & Dickson, N. M. (2003). Sustainability science: The emerging research program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8059-8061. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231333100

  • Clark, W. C., & Wokaun, A. (2003). Public participation in sustainability science: A handbook. Cambridge University Press.

  • Cuppen, E. (2012). Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: Considerations for design and methods. Policy Sciences, 45(1), 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-011-9141-7

  • Denis, P., Houser, S., & Ntsimane, R. (2011). A journey towards healing: Stories of people with multiple woundedness in KwaZulu-Natal. Cluster Publications.

  • Drimie, S., Hamann, R., Manderson, A. P., & Mlondobozi, N. (2018). Creating transformative spaces for dialogue and action: Reflecting on the experience of the Southern Africa Food Lab. Ecology and Society, 23(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10177-230302

  • Dyer, M. (2018). Transforming communicative spaces: The rhythm of gender in meetings in rural Solomon Islands. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09866-230117

  • Fazey, I., Schäpke, N., Caniglia, G., Patterson, J., Hultman, J., van Mierlo, B., … Wyborn, C. (2018). Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research. Energy Research and Social Science, 40, 54-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.026

  • Feola, G. (2015). Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: A review of emerging concepts. Ambio, 44(5), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0582-z

  • Ghosh, A. (2020). Deconstructing a 2-year long transdisciplinary sustainability project in Northern universities: Is rhetorical nobility obscuring procedural and political discords? Sustainability Science, 15(4), 1111-1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00816-8

  • Ghosh, B., Ramos-Mejía, M., Machado, R. C., Yuana, S. L., & Schiller, K. (2021). Decolonising transitions in the Global South: Towards more epistemic diversity in transitions research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 106-109.

  • Hebinck, A., & Page, D. (2017). Processes of participation in the development of urban food strategies: A comparative assessment of Exeter and Eindhoven. Sustainability, 9(6), 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060931

  • Hebinck, A., Vervoort, J. M., Hebinck, P., Rutting, L., & Galli, F. (2018). Imagining transformative futures: Participatory foresight for food systems. Ecology & Society, 23(2), 16.

  • Krohn, W., Grunwald, A., & Ukowitz, M. (2017). Transdisziplinäre Forschung revisited: Erkenntnisinteresse, Forschungsgegenstände, Wissensform und Methodologie. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(4), 341-347.

  • Kulundu, I., McGarry, D. K., & Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2020). Think piece: Learning, living and leading into transgression - A reflection on decolonial praxis in a neoliberal world. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 36, 111-130. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajee.v36i1.14

  • Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7, 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x

  • Loorbach, D. A. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x

  • Marshall, F., Dolley, J., & Priya, R. (2018). Transdisciplinary research as transformative space making for sustainability: Enhancing propoor transformative agency in periurban contexts. Ecology and Society, 23(3), 8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10249-230308

  • McCrory, G., Schäpke, N., Holmén, J., & Holmberg, J. (2020). Sustainability-oriented labs in real-world contexts: An exploratory review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 123202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123202

  • Moore, M.-L., Olsson, P., Nilsson, W., Rose, L., & Westley, F. R. (2018). Navigating emergence and system reflexivity as key transformative capacities: Experiences from a Global Fellowship program. Ecology and Society, 23(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10166-230238

  • Mukute, M., & Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2012). Working with cultural-historical activity theory and critical realism to investigate and expand farmer learning in Southern Africa. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(4), 342-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.656173

  • Nastar, M., Abbas, S., Aponte Rivero, C., Jenkins, S., & Kooy, M. (2018). The emancipatory promise of participatory water governance for the urban poor: Reflections on the transition management approach in the cities of Dodowa, Ghana and Arusha, Tanzania. African Studies, 77(4), 504-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2018.1459287

  • Norström, A. v, Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., … Österblom, H. (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability, 3, 182-190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2

  • Olsson, P., Moore, M. L., Westley, F. R., & McCarthy, D. D. P. (2017). The concept of the Anthropocene as a game-changer: A new context for social innovation and transformations to sustainability. Ecology and Society, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09310-220231

  • Pereira, L. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Hebinck, A., Charli-joseph, L., Drimie, S., Dyer, M., Eakin, H., Galafassi, D., Karpouzoglou, T., Marshall, F., Moore, L., Olsson, P., Zwanenberg, P. van, & Vervoort, J. M. (2020). Transformative spaces in the making: Key lessons from 9 cases in the Global South. Sustainability Science, 15, 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00749-x

  • Pereira, L. M., Hichert, T., Hamann, M., Preiser, R., & Biggs, R. (2018a). Using futures methods to create transformative spaces: Visions of a good Anthropocene in southern Africa. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09907-230119

  • Pereira, L. M., Karpouzoglou, T., Frantzeskaki, N., & Olsson, P. (2018b). Designing transformative spaces for sustainability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 32. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10607-230432

  • Polk, M., & Knutsson, P. (2008). Participation, value rationality and mutual learning in transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 643-653. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802464841

  • Ramos-Mejía, M., Franco-Garcia, M. L., & Jauregui-Becker, J. M. (2018). Sustainability transitions in the developing world: Challenges of socio-technical transformations unfolding in contexts of poverty. Environmental Science and Policy, 84(March), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.010

  • Ruth, D., & Harini, N. (2017). Ecosystem management as a wicked problem. Science, 356(6335), 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1950

  • Schipper, K., Silvestri, G., Wittmayer, J. M., Isoke, J. B., & Kulabako, R. (2019). Handle with care: Navigating the pluriformity of power to enable actionable knowledge for transitions in informal settlements in the global south. Urban Transformations, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-019-0004-4

  • Schneider, F., Giger, M., Harari, N., Moser, S., Oberlack, C., Providoli, I., Schmid, L., Tribaldos, T., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: Three generic mechanisms of impact generation. Environmental Science and Policy, 102(August), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.017

  • Silvestri, G., Wittmayer, J. M., Schipper, K., Kulabako, R., Oduro-Kwarteng, S., Nyenje, P., Komakech, H., & van Raak, R. (2018). Transition management for improving the sustainability of WASH services in informal settlements in Sub-Saharan Africa: An exploration. Sustainability, 10(11), 4052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114052

  • Stein, S. (2019). The ethical and ecological limits of sustainability: A decolonial approach to climate change in higher education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 35(3), 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2019.17

  • Trisos, C. H., Merow, C., & Pigot, A. L. (2020). The projected timing of abrupt ecological disruption from climate change. Nature, 580(7804), 496-501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2189-9

  • von Wirth, T., Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., & Coenen, L. (2019). Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: Mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 229-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895

  • Wieczorek, A. J. (2018). Sustainability transitions in developing countries: Major insights and their implications for research and policy. Environmental Science and Policy, 84(August), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.008

Handbook