Afifi, W. A., & Cornejo, M. (2020). #CommSoWEIRD: The question of sample representativeness in interpersonal communication research. In M. L. Doerfel & J. L. Gibbs (Eds.), Organizing inclusion: Moving diversity from demographics to communication processes (pp. 238_259). London: Routledge.

Anderson, A. H., McEwan, R., Bal, J., & Carletta, J. (2007). Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2558_2580. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.001

Andres, H. P. (2012). Technology-mediated collaboration, shared mental model and task performance. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 24, 64_81.

Araujo, T. (2018). Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.051

Ayega, E. N., & Muathe, S. (2018). Critical review of literature on cultural diversity in the work place and organizational performance: a research agenda. Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(1), 9_17. doi:10.11648.j.jhrm.20180601.12

Bailey, D. E., & Barley, S. R. (2020). Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies. Information and Organization, 30(2), 100286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100286

Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383_400. doi:10.1002/job.144

Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408_437. doi:10.2307/2393374

Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78_108. doi:10.2307/2392767

Brookshire, B. (2013). Psychology is WEIRD. Slate, May 8, 2013. https://slate.com/technology/2013/05/weird-psychology-social-science-researchers-rely-too-much-on-western-college-students.html

Bryant, S. M., Albring, S. M., & Murthy, U. (2009). The effects of reward structure, media richness and gender on virtual teams. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10, 190_213.

Brzozowski, M. J., Sandholm, T., & Hogg, T. (2009). Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP ’09) (pp. 61–70). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1531674.1531684

Chudoba, K. M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., & Watson-Manheim, M. B. (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal, 15(4), 279_306. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00200.x

Cramton, C. D., Orvis, K. L., & Wilson, J. M. (2007). Situation invisibility and attribution in distributed collaborations. Journal of Management, 33(4), 525_546. doi:10.1177/0149206307302549

Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420_443). London: Sage.

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554_571. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554

DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121_147. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121

DeVito, M. A., Birnholtz, J., & Hancock, J. T. (2017). Platforms, people, and perception: Using affordances to understand self-presentation on social media. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 740_754). doi:10.1145/2998181.2998192

DiMicco, J. M., Geyer, W., Millen, D. R., Dugan, C., & Brownholtz, B. (2009). People sensemaking and relationship building on an enterprise social network site. In 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1_10). IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2009.343

Ellison, N. B., & boyd, d. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of internet studies (pp. 151_172). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008

Ellison, N. B., Gibbs, J. L., & Weber, M. S. (2015). The use of enterprise social network sites for knowledge sharing in distributed organizations: The role of organizational affordances. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 103_123. 10.1177/0002764214540510

Erhardt, N., & Gibbs, J. L. (2014). The dialectical nature of impression management in knowledge work: Unpacking tensions in media use between managers and subordinates. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 155_186. doi:10.1177/0893318913520508

Erhardt, N., Gibbs, J., Martin-Rios, C., & Sherblom, J. (2016). Exploring affordances of email for team learning over time. Small Group Research, 47(3), 243_278. doi:10.1177/1046496416635823

Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35_52. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12180

Farzan, R., DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Brownholtz, B., Geyer, W., & Dugan, C. (2008). Results from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 563–572). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357145

Flyverbom, M., Leonardi, P. M., Stohl, C., & Stohl, M. (2016). Digital age: The management of visibilities in the digital age: Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 10, 98–109.

Fox, J., & McEwan, B. (2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 298_318. doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418

Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921_950. doi:10.5465/256641

Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. W. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117–140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Fulk, J., & Yuan, Y. C. (2013). Location, motivation, and social capitalization via enterprise social networking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 20_37. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12033

Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524_1541. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524

Gibbs, J. L. (2017). Rethinking virtuality in a digital media age. In J. Koponen, L. Kokkonen, E. Kostiainen, & I. A. Virtanen (Eds.) Prologi: Puheviestinnän vuosikirja 2017 (pp. 60_65). Prologos ry. Prologi.

Gibbs, J. L., Eisenberg, J., Rozaidi, N. A., & Griaznova, A. (2015). The “megapozitiv” role of enterprise social media in enabling cross-boundary communication in a distributed Russian organization. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 75_102. doi:10.1177/0002764214540511

Gibbs, J. L., Nekrassova, D., Grushina, S. V., & Wahab, S. A. (2008). Reconceptualizing virtual teaming from a constitutive perspective review, redirection, and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 32(1), 187_229. doi:10.1080/23808985.2008.11679078

Gibbs, J. L., Rice, R. E., & Kirkwood, G. L. (2021, online). Digital discipline: Theorizing concertive control in online communities. Communication Theory.

Gibbs, J. L., Rozaidi, N. A., & Eisenberg, J. (2013). Overcoming the “ideology of openness”: Probing the affordances of social media for organizational knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 102_120. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12034

Gibbs, J. L., Sivunen, A., & Boyraz, M. (2017). Investigating the impacts of team type and design on virtual team processes. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 590_603. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.006

Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451_495. doi:10.2189/asqu.51.3.451

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Gilson, L., Costa, P., O’Neill, T. A., & Maynard, T. (in press). The role of leaders in putting the “TEAM” back into virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics.

Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313_1337. doi:10.1177/0149206314559946

Gonzales, A. L., McCrory Calarco, J., & Lynch, T. (2020). Technology problems and student achievement gaps: A validation and extension of the technology maintenance construct. Communication Research, 47(5), 750_770. doi:10.1177/0093650218796366

Hadden, J., Casado, L., Sonnemaker, T., & Borden, T. (2020). 21 major companies that have announced employees can work remotely long-term. Business Insider, December 14, 2020. https://www.businessinsider.com/companies-asking-employees-to-work-from-home-due-to-coronavirus-2020

Hinds, P., Kiesler, S. B., & Kiesler, S. (Eds.) (2002). Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hinds, P. J., & Mortensen, M. (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290_307. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0122

Hollingshead, A. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 46–78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Holtzblatt, L., & Tierney, M. L. (2011). Measuring the effectiveness of social media on an innovation process. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 697–712). New York: ACM.

Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441_456. doi:10.1017/S0038038501000219

Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700_718. doi:10.1177/0149206305279113

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Electronic media variety and virtual team performance: The mediating role of task complexity coping mechanisms. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(4), 325_344. doi:10.1109/TPC.2012.2208393

Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347_367. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002

Kuo, F. Y., Tseng, C. Y., Tseng, F. C., & Lin, C. S. (2013). A study of social information control affordances and gender difference in Facebook self-presentation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 635_644. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0345

Ledbetter, A. M. (2009). Measuring online communication attitude: Instrument development and validation. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 463_486. doi:10.1080/03637750903300262

Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147_167.

Leonardi, P. M., & Treem, J. W. (2012). Knowledge management technology as a stage for strategic self-presentation: Implications for knowledge sharing in organizations. Information & Organization, 22, 37_59. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.10.003

Leonardi, P. M., & Treem, J. W. (2020). Behavioral visibility: A new paradigm for organization studies in the age of digitization, digitalization, and datafication. Organization Studies, 41(12), 1601_1625. doi:10.1177/0170840620970728

Leonardi, P. M., Treem, J. W., & Jackson, M. H. (2010). The connectivity paradox: Using technology to both decrease and increase perceptions of distance in distributed work arrangements. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(1), 85–105. doi:10.1080/00909880903483599

Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38_55. doi:/10.1111/jcc4.12030

Makarius, E. E., & Larson, B. Z. (2017). Changing the perspective of virtual work: Building virtual intelligence at the individual level. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(2), 159_178. doi:10.5465/amp.2014.0120

Mazmanian, M. (2013). Avoiding the trap of constant connectivity: When congruent frames allow for heterogenous practices. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1225_1250. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0787

Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337–1357. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0806

McGrenere, J. & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying an evolving concept. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000: Montréal, Québec, Canada, May 15–17, 2000, pp. 179–186. doi:10.20380/GI2000.24

Navick, N. (2021). Boundary management during COVID-19: A mixed-methods approach to investigating underrepresented students’ navigation of work–life conflict [Master’s thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara]. ProQuest.

Navick, N., & Mazur, A. P. (2021, November). The role of technological affordances in cybersexual harassment: Additional opportunities, added consequences, and antiquated outcomes. [Paper presentation]. National Communication Association’s 107th Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, United States.

Nordbäck, E. S., Nurmi, N., Gibbs, J. L., Boyraz, M., & Logemann, M. K. (2021). The vitality paradox: Rising tensions between individual and team coping during forced virtual work. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, August 2021.

Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.

Norman, D. A. (1998). The invisible computer: Why good products can fail, the personal computer is so complex, and information appliances are the solution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Oborn, E., Barrett, M., & Orlikowski, W. (2019). Trajectory dynamics in innovation: Developing and transforming a mobile money service across time and place. Organization Science, 30(5), 1097_1123. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1281

O’Leary, M. B., & Cummings, J. N. (2007). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 433_452. doi:10.2307/25148802

Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435_1448.

Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1991). Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting environment. Management Science, 37(8), 909_1065. doi:10.1287/mnsc.37.8.926

Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019). Virtual work: Bridging research clusters. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 308_341. doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0020

Rapp, A., Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, T. (2010). Managing sales teams in a virtual environment. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 213_224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.003

Rice, R. E., Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Sivunen, A., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Organizational media affordances: Operationalization and associations with media use. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 106_130. doi:10.1111/jcom.12273

Schouten, A., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an “internet-attribute-perception model”. Media Psychology, 10, 292–315. doi:10.1080/15213260701375686

Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley.

Sturken, M. & Thomas, D. (2004). Introduction: Technological visions and the rhetoric of the new. In M. Sturken, D. Thomas, & S. J. Ball-Rokeach (Eds.), Technological visions: The hopes and fears that shape new technologies (pp. 1_18). New York: John Wiley.

Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 504_525. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.845827

Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315_337. doi:10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y

Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143_189. doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130

Treem, J. W., Leonardi, P. M., & van den Hooff, B. (2020). Computer-mediated communication in the age of communication visibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 44_59. doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz024

Van Dorn, A., Cooney, R. E., & Sabin, M. L. (2020). COVID-19 exacerbating inequalities in the US. Lancet, 395(10232), 1243_1244. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30893-X

Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429_442. doi:10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417

Wajcman, J., & Rose, E. (2011). Constant connectivity: Rethinking interruptions at work. Organization Studies, 32(7), 941_961. doi:10.1177/0170840611410829

Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52_91. doi:10.1177/009365092019001003

Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3_43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001

Walther, J. B. (2009). Computer-mediated communication. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, & D. R. Ewoldsen (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 489–505). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50_88. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00295.x

Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529_563). London: Sage.

Wilson, J. M., O’Leary, M. B., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008). Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization Studies, 29, 979_1002. doi:10.1177/0170840607083105

Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 8(1), 69_91. doi:10.1080/1361332052000341006