This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License. It is free to read, download and share on Elgaronline.com. This incisive book explores the implications of the nature–culture binary and how it impacts the ways in which we think about nature. Bringing together and building on extensive work from varied fields, E. C. H. Keskitalo maps the many understandings of nature across diverse traditions and histories, and demonstrates that nature relations must be understood in connection to power.

  • Abrams, J., & Bliss, J. C. (2013). Amenity landownership, land use change, and the re-creation of "working landscapes". Society & Natural Resources, 26(7), 845–859.

  • Agnoletti, M., & Santoro, A. (2015) Cultural values and sustainable forest management: the case of Europe. Journal of Forest Research, 20(5), 438–444.

  • Alhinai, M., & Milstein, T. (2019). From kin to commodity: ecocultural relations in transition in Oman. Local Environment, 24(12), 1078–1096.

  • Allouche, J., & Finger, M. (2001). Water Privatisation: Trans-National Corporations and the Re-regulation of the Water Industry. CRC Press: London.

  • Andersson, E., & Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2017). Technology use in Swedish reindeer husbandry through a social lens. Polar Geography, 40(1), 19–34

  • Antrop, M. (2014). Interpreting diversity in the European landscape: a comment on perspective essays by Agnoletti and Schnitzler. Landscape and Urban Planning, 126, 81–83.

  • Araral, E. (2013). Ostrom's legacies on environmental governance: a critical appreciation and a revisionist view. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Research Paper No. 13–15.

  • Araral, E. (2014). Ostrom, Hardin and the commons: a critical appreciation and a revisionist view. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 11–23.

  • Avanesi, V. (2020). Second-screen subsumption: aesthetics of control and the second-screen facilitation of hyper-attentive watching-labour. Convergence, 26(2), 369–385.

  • Babie, P., & Nikias, K. (2019). The renewal of the old: Lionel Murphy's progressive-relational conception of property. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 42(3), 790–824.

  • Bailey, D. (2015). 24/7: Late capitalism and the ends of sleep, by Jonathan Crary. Rethinking Marxism, 27(1), 138–140.

  • Bastmeijer, K., & Koivurova, T. (2008, eds). Theory and Practice of Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment. Brill/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden/Boston.

  • Baudrillard, J. (1981). For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Telos: St. Louis, MO.

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society – Towards a New Modernity. Sage: London.

  • Beery, T. (2011). Nordic in nature: friluftsliv and environmental connectedness (Dissertation). ProQuest/UMI (umn11804): University of Minnesota.

  • Berenskötter, F., & Nymalm, N. (2021). States of ambivalence: recovering the concept of "the stranger" in international relations. Review of International Studies, 47(1), 19–38.

  • Bergstén, S. & Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2018) Feeling at home from a distance? How geographical distance and non-residency shape sense of place among private forest owners. Society & Natural Resources, 32(3), 1–20.

  • Block, W., & Jankovic, I. (2016). Tragedy of the partnership: a critique of Elinor Ostrom. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 75(2), 289–318.

  • Blomley, N. (2007). Making private property: enclosure, common right and the work of hedges. Rural History, 18(1), 1–21.

  • Bluemel, K. (2019). The regional and the rural. In J. Smith (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to British Literature of the 1930s. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp.¬†160–174.

  • Borras Jr, S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2011). Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 209–216.

  • Brandon, P. (2018). "With the name changed, the story applies to you!": Connections between slavery and "free" labor in the writings of Marx. In U. Bosma, & K. Hofmeester (eds), The Lifework of a Labor Historian: Essays in Honor of Marcel Van Der Linden. Brill, pp.¬†71–89.

  • Brown, D. (2011). Back to the Land: The Enduring Dream of Self-Sufficiency in Modern America. University of Wisconsin Press: Madison.

  • Buijs, A. E., Pedroli, B., & Luginb√ºhl, Y. (2006). From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landscape Ecology, 21(3), 375–389.

  • Bunce, M. (1994). The Countryside Ideal: Anglo-American Images of Landscape. Routledge: London.

  • Burchardt, J. (2007). Agricultural history, rural history, or countryside history? Historical Journal, 50(2), 465–481.

  • Burden, R. (2006). Introduction: Englishness and spatial practices. In R. Burden, & S. Kohl (eds), Landscape and Englishness. Rodopi: Amsterdam, pp.¬†13–26.

  • Busch, L., & Bain, C. (2004). New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system. Rural Sociology, 69(3), 321–346.

  • B√ºscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2015). Accumulation by conservation. New Political Economy, 20(2), 273–298.

  • B√ºscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2017). Destructive creation: capital accumulation and the structural violence of tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(5), 651–667.

  • B√ºscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2018). Under pressure: conceptualising political ecologies of green wars. Conservation and Society, 16(2), 105–113.

  • B√ºscher, B., van den Bremer, R., Fletcher, R. & Koot, S. (2017a). Authenticity and the contradictions of the "ecotourism script": global marketing and local politics in Ghana. Critical Arts, 31(4), 37–52.

  • B√ºscher, B., Fletcher, R., Brockington, D., Sandbrook, C., Adams, B., Campbell, L., ‚Ķ & Holmes, G. (2017b). Doing whole earth justice: a reply to Cafaro et al. Oryx, 51(3), 401–401.

  • B√ºscher, B., Sullivan, S., Neves, K., Igoe, J., & Brockington, D. (2012). Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23(2), 4–30.

  • Butler, A. (2016). Dynamics of integrating landscape values in landscape character assessment: the hidden dominance of the objective outsider. Landscape Research, 41(2), 239–25

  • Cabral, L., & Sumberg, J. (2022). The use of epic narratives in promoting "natural agriculture". Outlook on Agriculture, 51(1), 129–136.

  • Cafaro, P., Butler, T., Crist, E., Cryer, P., Dinerstein, E., Kopnina, H., ‚Ķ & Washington, H. (2017). If we want a whole Earth, nature needs half: a response to B√ºscher et al. Oryx, 51(3), 400.

  • Campelo, A. (2015). Rethinking sense of place: sense of one and sense of many. In M. Kavaratzis, G. Warnaby, & G. J. Ashworth (eds), Rethinking Place Branding, Comprehensive Brand Development for Cities and Regions. Springer: Heidelberg, pp.¬†51–60.

  • Carrier, J. G., & Macleod, D.V.L. (2005). Bursting the bubble: the social cultural context of ecotourism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11, 315–334.

  • Cederholm, M. (2007). De v√§rjde sin r√§tt: senmedeltida bondemotst√•nd i Sk√•ne och Sm√•land. Department of History, Lund University: Lund.

  • Chaplin, D. (1999). Consuming work/productive leisure: the consumption patterns of second home environments, Leisure Studies, 18(1), 41–55.

  • Clark, B. (2002). Migratory things on land: property rights and a law of capture. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 6(3).

  • Clark, C., & Page, J. (2019). Of protest, the commons, and customary public rights: an ancient tale of the lawful forest. The University of New South Wales Law Journal, 42(1), 26–59.

  • Clem, T., & Serge, S. (2015). The persistence of hunting and gathering economies. Social Evolution & History, 14(2), 3–26.

  • Cloke, P., & Johnston, R. (2005). Deconstructing human geography's binaries. In P. Cloke, & R. Johnston (eds), Spaces of Geographical Thought: Deconstructing Human Geography's Binaries. Sage, pp.¬†1–20.

  • Colburn, J. E. (2005). The indignity of federal wildlife habitat law. Alabama Law Review, 57, 417.

  • Corlett, R. T. (2016). The role of rewilding in landscape design for conservation. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 1(3), 127–133.

  • Cox, M., Arnold, G. & Villamayor Tomás, S. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 38ff.

  • Cronon, W. (1995) The myth of wilderness. In W. Cronon (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. W.W. Norton: New York.

  • Cronon, W. (1996). The trouble with wilderness: or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environmental History, 1(1), 7–28.

  • Cruickshank, J. A. (2009). A play for rurality – modernization versus local autonomy. Journal of Rural Studies, 25, 98–107.

  • Curry, N. R. (2009). Leisure in the landscape – rural incomes and public benefits. In A. Bonn, T. Allott, K. Hubacek, & J. Stewart (eds), Drivers of Environmental Change in Uplands. Routledge: Abingdon, pp.¬†276–289.

  • Cypher, J., & Higgs, E. (1997). Colonizing the imagination: Disney's wilderness lodge, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 8(4), 107–130.

  • Daryl Slack, J. (2008). Resisting ecocultural studies. Cultural Studies, 22(3–4), 477–497.

  • Dawson, N. M., Coolsaet, B., Sterling, E. J., Loveridge, R., Gross-Camp, N. D., Wongbusarakum, S., ‚Ķ & Rosado-May, F. J. (2021). The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective and equitable conservation. Ecology and Society, 26(3), 19.

  • De Sherbinin, A., VanWey, L. K., McSweeney, K., Aggarwal, R., Barbieri, A., Henry, S., ‚Ķ & Walker, R. (2008). Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 38–53.

  • Dick, E., & Duch√™ne-Lacroix, (2016). Multi-local living in the global south and global north: differences, convergences and universality of an underestimated phenomenon. Trialog, 116(1–2), 4–9.

  • Dickinson, E. (2016). Ecocultural conversations: bridging the human–nature divide through connective communication practices. Southern Communication Journal, 81(1), 32–48.

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.

  • Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

  • Dunlap, R. (2013). Playin' farmer: leisure experiences in a craft-based community of practice, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(1), 118–137.

  • Durkheim, E., & Mauss, M. (2009). Primitive Classification (Routledge Revivals). Routledge: London and New York.

  • Ellingsen, W. G., & Hidle, K. (2013). Performing home in mobility: second homes in Norway. Tourism Geographies, 15(2), 250–267.

  • Engelken, M., Römer, B., Drescher, M., & Welpe, I. (2018). Why homeowners strive for energy self-supply and how policy makers can influence them. Energy Policy, 117, 423–433.

  • Ervola, A., & Uusivuori, J. (2014). Public right of access to private land: some examples and considerations. In H. Kola, P. Herbst, & R. ä†ulek (eds), Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development, Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium Albania. IUFRO Division 9: Forest Policy and Economics Research Group 9.06.00 (former 6.13.00): Forest Law and Environmental Legislation. Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Economics and Management Technical University in Zvolen, pp.¬†40–54.

  • Fagan, M. (2017). Security in the Anthropocene: environment, ecology, escape. European Journal of International Relations, 23(2), 292–314.

  • Ferrario, V. (2008). Rural/leisure landscapes and amenity-led migration: an example in the Eastern Alps. In L. A. G. Moss, R. S. Glorioso, & A. Krause (eds), Understanding and Managing Amenity-Led Migration in Mountain Regions. The Banff Centre and International Amenity Migration Centre: Banff, AB and Spokane, WA, pp.¬†107–117.

  • Fortmann, L. (1990). Locality and custom: non-aboriginal claims to customary usufructuary rights as a source of rural protest. Journal of Rural Studies, 6(2), 195–208.

  • Foucault, M. (1974). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Tavistock: London.

  • Fox, S., & Goodfellow, T. (2022). On the conditions of "late urbanisation". Urban Studies, 59(10), 1959–1980.

  • French, H. R., & Hoyle, R. W. (2013). The Character of English Rural Society: Earls Colne, 1550–1750. Manchester University Press: Manchester.

  • Gammon, A.R. (2017). Not lawn, nor pasture, nor mead: rewilding and the cultural landscape (Dissertation). Radboud University: Nijmegen.

  • Genosko, G. (1994). Baudrillard and Signs: Signification Ablaze. Routledge: London and New York.

  • Genosko, G. (1996). The Guattari Reader. Blackwell Publishers: Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA.

  • Giblett, R. (2012). Nature is ordinary too: Raymond Williams as the founder of ecocultural studies. Cultural Studies, 26(6), 922–933.

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Polity Press: Cambridge.

  • Giddens, A. (1999). "Tradition". The BBC Reith Lectures Revisited, 24 November 1999.

  • Giessen, L., Burns, S., Sahide, M. A. K., & Wibowo, A. (2016). From governance to government: the strengthened role of state bureaucracies in forest and agricultural certification. Policy and Society, 35(1), 71–89.

  • Gladkova, E. (2020). Farming intensification and environmental justice in Northern Ireland. Critical Criminology, 28(3), 445–461.

  • Gmeiner, N., Sievers-Glotzbach, S., & Becker, C. (2021). New values for new challenges: the emergence of progressive commons as a property regime for the 21st century. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 24(2), 187–207.

  • Gramigna, R. (2018). Augustine and the study of signs and signification (Dissertation). University of Tartu: Tartu, Estonia.

  • Grisel, F. (2019). Managing the fishery commons at Marseille: how a medieval institution failed to accommodate change in an age of globalization. Fish and Fisheries, 20(3), 419–433.

  • Grusky, D. B. (2019). Industrialism and industrial man. In D. B. Grusky (ed.), Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective. Routledge: London, pp.¬†793–804.

  • G√ºnay, D., & Arƒ±kan, G. (2022). The public as an audience for the securitisation of climate change: facilitating conditions at the identification stage. Journal of International Relations and Development, 25(3), 635–656.

  • Hann, C. (2014). Evolution, institutions, and human well-being: perspectives from a critical social anthropology. Journal of Bioeconomics, 16(1), 61–69.

  • Halfacree, K. (2006). From dropping out to leading on? British counter-cultural back-to-the-land in a changing rurality. Progress in Human Geography, 30(3), 309–336.

  • Hall, C. M. (2015). Tourism and biological exchange and invasions: a missing dimension in sustainable tourism? Tourism Recreation Research, 40(1), 81–94.

  • Harden-Davies, H., Humphries, F., Maloney, M., Wright, G., Gjerde, K., & Vierros, M. (2020). Rights of nature: perspectives for global ocean stewardship. Marine Policy, 122, 104059.

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Blackwell: Oxford.

  • Heikkurinen, P. (2021). A technological experience unfolding: meaning for the post-Anthropocene. In P. Heikkurinen, & T. Ruuska (eds), Sustainability Beyond Technology: Philosophy, Critique, and Implications for Human Organization. Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp.¬†96–109.

  • Helsinger, E. K. (2014). Rural Scenes and National Representation: Britain, 1815–1850. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

  • Hess, C. (2008). Mapping the new commons. Presented at the Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, Cheltenham, UK, 14–18 July. Available at SSRN 1356835: https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=sul.

  • Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2003). Ideas, artifacts, and facilities: information as a common-pool resource. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1/2), 111–145.

  • Hindle, S. (2015). Representing rural society: labor, leisure, and the landscape in an eighteenth-century conversation piece. Critical Inquiry, 41(3), 615–654.

  • Hiltunen, M. J., & Rehunen, A. (2014). Second home mobility in Finland: patterns, practices and relations of leisure oriented mobile lifestyle. Fennia, 192(1), 1–22.

  • Howard, C. A. (2016). Mobile Lifeworlds: An Ethnography of Tourism and Pilgrimage in the Himalayas. Routledge: New York and London.

  • Howkins, A. (1992). Social history and agricultural history. Agricultural History Review, 40(2), 160–163.

  • Howkins, A. (1994). Peasants, servants and labourers: the marginal workforce in British agriculture, c 1870–1914. The Agricultural History Review, 92(1), 49–62.

  • Hughes, A. (2000). Retailers, knowledges and changing commodity networks: the case of the cut flower trade. Geoforum, 31(2), 175–190.

  • Igoe, J., Neves, K. and Brockington, D. (2010). A spectacular eco-tour around the historic bloc: theorising the convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion. Antipode, 42, 486–512.

  • Jacoby, K. (2001). Crimes Against Nature: Squatters, Poachers, Thieves and the Hidden History of American Conservation. University of California Press: Berkeley.

  • Jaffe, J., & Gertler, M. (2006). Victual vicissitudes: consumer deskilling and the (gendered) transformation of food systems. Agriculture and Human Values, 23(2), 143–162.

  • Jahn, B. (2013). Liberal Internationalism: Theory, History, Practice. Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills, Basingstoke.

  • Jiménez-Esquinas, G., & Sánchez-Carretero, C. (2018). Who owns the name of a place? On place branding and logics in two villages in Galicia, Spain. Tourist Studies, 18(1), 3–20.

  • Jones, G. S. (1977). Class expression versus social control? A critique of recent trends in the social history of "leisure". History Workshop, 4, 162–170.

  • Jones, P. M. (2016). Agricultural Enlightenment: Knowledge, Technology, and Nature, 1750–1840. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

  • J√∏rgensen, D. (2015) Rethinking rewilding. Geoforum, 65, 482–488.

  • Kavaratzis, M., & Kalandides, A. (2015). Rethinking the place brand: the interactive formation of place brands and the role of participatory place branding. Environment and Planning A, 47(6), 1368–1382.

  • Kaufmann, E. (1998). "Naturalizing the nation": the rise of naturalistic nationalism in the United States and Canada. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 40(4), 666–695.

  • Keith, W. (1974). The Rural Tradition. University of Toronto Press: Toronto.

  • Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2004). Negotiating the Arctic: The Construction of an International Region. Routledge: New York and London.

  • Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2008). Climate Change and Globalization in the Arctic: An Integrated Approach to Vulnerability Assessment. Earthscan Publications: London.

  • Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2017, ed.). Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use: Natural Resource Management in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.

  • Keskitalo, E. C. H., & C. Southcott (2015). Globalisation. In J. Nymand Larsen, & G. Fondahl (eds), Arctic Human Development Report. Regional Processes and Global Linkages. Nordic Council of Ministers: Copenhagen.

  • Keskitalo, E. C. H., Horstkotte, T., Kivinen, S., Forbes, B., & K√§yhkö, J. (2016). Generality of mis-fit? The real-life difficulty of matching scales in an interconnected world. Ambio, 45(6), 742–752.

  • Keskitalo, E. C. H., Karlsson, S., Lindgren, U., Pettersson, √-., Lundmark, L., Slee, B., Villa, M., & Feliciano, D. (2017). Rural–urban politics: changing conceptions of the human–environment relationship. In E. C. H. Keskitalo (ed.), Globalisation and Change in Forest Ownership and Forest Use: Natural Resource Management in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp.¬†183–224.

  • Kracauer, S. (1989). The hotel lobby. In T. Y. Levin (ed.), The Mass Ornament: Weimar Essays by Siegfrid Kracauer. Routledge: New York, pp.¬†173–186.

  • Kulikoff, A. (1989). The transition to capitalism in early America, The William and Mary Quarterly, 46, 120–144.

  • Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

  • Lansing, D., Collard, R. C., Dempsey, J., Sundberg, J., Heynen, N., B√ºscher, B., ‚Ķ & Fletcher, R. (2015). Nature Inc.: environmental conservation in a neoliberal age. Environment and Planning A, 47(11), 2389–2408.

  • Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

  • Lee, J., & Garikipati, S. (2011). Negotiating the non-negotiable: British foraging law in theory and practice. Journal of Environmental Law, 23(3), 415–439.

  • Lehtonen, O., Muilu, T., & Vihinen, H. (2019). Multi-local living – an opportunity for rural health services in Finland? European Countryside, 11(2), 257–280.

  • Linebaugh, P. (2008). The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons for All. University of California Press: Berkeley.

  • Lim, W. K. (2011). Understanding risk governance: introducing sociological neoinstitutionalism and Foucauldian governmentality for further theorizing. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2(3), 11–20.

  • Lorimer, J., Sandom, C., Jepson, P., Doughty, C., Barua, M., & Kirby, K. J. (2015). Rewilding: science, practice, and politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40, 39–62.

  • Lovelock, B., Walters, T., Jellum, C., & Thompson-Carr, A. (2016). The participation of children, adolescents, and young adults in nature-based recreation. Leisure Sciences, 38(5), 441–460.

  • Lowenthal, D. (2007). Living with and looking at landscape, Landscape Research, 32(5), 635–656

  • Lowenthal, D. (2013). Eden, Earth Day, and ecology: landscape restoration as metaphor and mission, Landscape Research, 38(1), 5–31

  • Lu, Y., & de Vries, W. T. (2021). A bibliometric and visual analysis of rural development research. Sustainability, 13(11), 6136.

  • Lucassen, J. (2018). Workers: new developments in labor history since the 1980s. In U. Bosma, & K. Hofmeester (eds), The Lifework of a Labor Historian: Essays in Honor of Marcel Van Der Linden. Brill, pp.¬†22–46.

  • Lupp, G., Höchtl, F., & Wende, W. (2011). "Wilderness"– a designation for Central European landscapes? Land Use Policy, 28(3), 594–603.

  • MacCannell, D. (2013). The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class. University of California Press: Berkeley.

  • Magro Algarotti, J. (2012). The Austrian imaginary of wilderness: landscape, history, and identity in contemporary Austrian literature (Doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University.

  • Malaby, T. M. (2007). Beyond play: a new approach to games. Games and Culture, 2(2), 95–113.

  • Margaryan, L. (2016). Nature as a commercial setting: the case of nature-based tourism providers in Sweden. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(16), 1–19.

  • Marginson, S., & Xu, X. (2021). Moving beyond centre–periphery science: towards an ecology of knowledge. Working paper no. 63 April 2021. Centre for Global Higher Education, University of Oxford.

  • Margulis, M. E., McKeon, N., & Borras Jr, S. M. (2013). Land grabbing and global governance: critical perspectives. Globalizations, 10(1), 1–23.

  • McDonagh, B. (2013). Making and breaking property: negotiating enclosure and common rights in sixteenth-century England. History Workshop Journal, 76(1), 32–56.

  • McGillen, B. L. (2021). Incorporating emotion into securitisation studies: fear-based psychological models of securitisation attitudes. PhD thesis. School of Government and Public Policy University of Strathclyde.

  • Milstein, T., & Castro-Sotomayor, J. (2020). Ecocultural identity: an introduction. In T. Milstein, & J. Castro-Sotomayor (eds), Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity. Routledge: London and New York, pp. i–xxiii.

  • Mollinga, P. P. (2020). Of binaries, boundaries and benevolence: critical interdisciplinarity in natural resources management. In A. Bruns, & R. Kanesu (eds), B/ordering the Anthropocene: Inter- and Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Nature–Culture Relations. Borders in Perspective – UniGR-CBS thematic issue 5, 70–93.

  • Moranda, S. (2015). The emergence of an environmental history of tourism. Journal of Tourism History, 7(3), 268–289.

  • Morrison, T. H., Lane, M. B., & Hibbard, M. (2015). Planning, governance and rural futures in Australia and the USA: revisiting the case for rural regional planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(9), 1601–1616.

  • Mortelmans, D. (2005). Sign values in processes of distinction: the concept of luxury. Semiotica, 157, 497–520.

  • Nash, R. (1982). Wilderness and the American Mind. Yale University Press: New Haven and London.

  • Navarro, L. M. and Pereira, H. M. (2012). Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems, 15, 900–912.

  • Navarro, L. M. and Pereira, H. M. (2015). Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. In H. M. Pereira, & L. M. Navarro (eds), Rewilding European Landscapes. Springer Open: New York, pp.¬†3–23.

  • Olsson, L., Jerneck, A., Thoren, H., Persson, J., & O'Byrne, D. (2015). Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience. Science Advances, 1(4), e1400217.

  • Olwig, K. R. (2007). The practice of landscape "conventions" and the just landscape: the case of the European landscape convention, Landscape Research, 32(5), 579–594.

  • Olwig, K. R. (2016). Virtual enclosure, ecosystem services, landscape's character and the "rewilding" of the commons: the "Lake District" case. Landscape Research, 41(2), 253–264.

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

  • Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20, 550–557.

  • Paavola, J. (2007). Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecological Economics, 63, 93–103.

  • Parker, P. and M. Johansson (2011). The uses and abuses of Elinor Ostrom's concept of commons in urban theorizing. Presented at the International Conference of the European Urban Research Association (EURA) 2011: Cities without limits, June 23–25, Copenhagen.

  • Parks, M. M. (2020). Critical ecocultural intersectionality. In T. Milstein, & J. Castro-Sotomayor (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity. Routledge: London and New York, pp.¬†103–114.