The first part of the chapter explores the legal nature of the authorization procedures despite the presence of political elements. Then the next part investigates whether the authorization procedure necessitates an abstract or a concrete review from the decision-maker and compares referendum authorization procedures to constitutional adjudication and administrative procedures. The last part of the chapter takes a closer look at the most common formal and substantive legal limits.
-
Abts, Koen, Stefan Rummens, ‘Populism versus Democracy’ (2007) 55 Political Studies 405.
-
Alber, Elisabeth, ‘Ethnic Governance and Direct Democracy: Perils and Potential’ in Wilfried Marxer (ed), Direct Democracy and Minorities (Springer VS 2012).
-
Alexy, Robert, A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification (Oxford University Press 2010).
-
Alivizatos, Nicos C., ‘Revision of the Code of Good Practice on Referendums’ in Daniel Moeckli, Anna Forgács, Henri Ibi (eds), The Legal Limits of Direct Democracy (Edward Elgar Publishing 2021).
-
Allan, T.R.S., ‘Requiring Reasons for Reasons of Fairness and Reasonableness’ (1994) 53(2) The Cambridge Law Journal 207.
-
Altman, David, Direct Democracy Worldwide (Cambridge University Press 2010).
-
Anderson, Helen A., ‘Frenemies of the Court: The Many Faces of Amicus Curiae’ (2015) 49 U. Ric. L. Rev. 361.
-
Arditi, Benjamin, Politics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation (Edinburgh University Press 2007).
-
Atikcan, Ece Özlem, ‘The Expression of Popular Will: Do Campaigns Matter and How Do Voters Decide?’ in Laurence Morel, Matt Qvortrup (eds), The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy (Routledge 2018).
-
Auer, Andreas and Michael Bützer (eds), Direct Democracy: The Eastern and Central European Experience (Ashgate 2001).
-
Auer, Andreas, Nicolas von Arx, ‘Direkte Demokratie ohne Grenzen? Ein Diskussionsbeitrag zur Frage der Verfassungsmässigkeit von Einbürgerungs-beschlüssen durch das Volk’ [2000] Aktuelle Juristische Praxis 923.
-
Auer, Andreas, Nicolas Aubert, Evren Somer, ‘So besser nicht: Kritische Anmerkungen zum materiellen Vorprüfungsverfahren für Volksinitiativen im Bund’ [2013] Aktuelle Juristische Praxis 659.
-
Baranger, Denis, Christina Murray, ‘Systems of Government’ in Mark Tushnet et al. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law (Routledge 2013).
-
Baraník, Kamil, ‘Slovakia’ in Daniel Moeckli, Anna Forgács, Henri Ibi (eds), The Legal Limits of Direct Democracy (Edward Elgar Publishing 2021).
-
Baumann, Robert, ‘Völkerrechtliche Schranken der Verfassungsrevision’ (2007) 108 Schweizerisches Zentralblatt für Staats- und Verwaltungsrecht 181.
-
Bayles, M.E., Procedural Justice: Allocating to Individuals (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 1990).
-
Bell, John, Judiciaries Within Europe: A Comparative Review (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
-
Bell, John and Marie-Luce Paris (eds), Rights-based Constitutional Review: Constitutional Courts in a Changing Landscape (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016).
-
Belov, Martin (ed), The Role of Courts in Contemporary Legal Orders (Eleven International Publishing 2019).
-
Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, Gisèle De Meur, Benoît Rihoux, Charles C Ragin, ‘Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach’ [2009] 1 Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques 1.
-
Beriger, Julian Ivan, ‘Russia’ in Daniel Moeckli, Anna Forgács, Henri Ibi (eds), The Legal Limits of Direct Democracy (Edward Elgar Publishing 2021).
-
Besselink, Leonard F.M., ‘The Proliferation of Constitutional Law and Constitutional Adjudication, or How American Judicial Review Came to Europe After All’ (2013) 9(2) Utrecht Law Review 19–35.
-
Biaggini, Giovanni, ‘Die schweizerische direkte Demokratie und das Völkerrecht – Gedanken aus Anlass der Volksabstimmung über die Volksinitiative Gegen den Bau von Minaretten’ (2010) 65 Springer-Verlag Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 325.
-
Biaggini, Giovanni, ‘Constitutional Adjudication in Switzerland’ in Armin von Bogdandy, Peter Huber, Christoph Grabenwarter (eds) Constitutional Judicial Review: Institutions (Oxford University Press 2020).
-
Bingham, Tom, The Rule of Law (Penguin Books 2011).
-
Birgelis, Martins, ‘Latvia’ in Daniel Moeckli, Anna Forgács, Henri Ibi (eds), The Legal Limits of Direct Democracy (Edward Elgar Publishing 2021).
-
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books. Notes selected from the editions of Archibold, Christian, Coleridge, Chitty, Stewart, Kerr, and others, Barron Field’s Analysis, and Additional Notes, and a Life of the Author by George Sharswood. In Two Volumes. (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co., 1893).
-
Boggio, Andrea, ‘Italy Enacts New Law on Medically Assisted Reproduction’ (2005) 20(5) Human Reproduction 1153.
-
Bowler, Shaun, ‘When is it OK to Limit Direct Democracy?’ (2013) 97(5) Minnesota Law Review 1780.
-
Bowler, Shaun, Todd Donovan (eds), Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press 1998).
-
Boyron, Sophie, Wendy Lacey, ‘Procedural Fairness Generally’ in Mark Tushnet, Thomas Fleiner, Cheryl Saunders (eds), Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law (Routledge 2013).
-
Bradley, Kieran, ‘Tribunals and Adjudication’ in Peter Cane, Herwig C.H. Hofmann, Eric C. Ip, and Peter L. Lindseth (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law (Oxford University Press 2020).
-
Brunner, Georg, ‘Direct vs. Representative Democracy’ in Andreas Auer and Michael Bützer (eds), Direct Democracy: The Eastern and Central European Experience (Ashgate 2001).
-
Bugaric, Bojan, Alenka Kuhelj, ‘Varieties of Populism in Europe: Is the Rule of Law in Danger?’ (2018) 10 Hague J Rule Law 21.
-
Butković, Hrvoje, ‘The Rise of Direct Democracy in Croatia: Balancing or Challenging Parliamentary Representation?’ (2017) 23(77) Croatian International Relations Review 39.
-
Butler, David, Austin Ranney (eds), Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory (American Enterprise Institute 1978).
-
Bützer, Michael, ‘Introduction’ in Andreas Auer, Michael Bützer (eds), Direct Democracy: The Eastern and Central European Experience (Ashgate 2001).
-
Cappelletti, Mauro, ‘“Who Watches the Watchmen?” A Comparative Study on Judicial Responsibility’ (1983) 31(1) The American Journal of Comparative Law 1.
-
Čepo, Dario, Dario Nikić Čakar, ‘Direct Democracy and the Rise of Political Entrepreneurs: An Analysis of Citizens’ Initiatives in Post-2010 Croatia’ (2019) 16(1) Anali 27.
-
Cheneval, Francis, Mónica Ferrín, ‘Direct Democracy in the European Union: An Option for Democratic Empowerment?’ in David Levi-Faur, Frans van Waarden (eds), Democratic Empowerment in the European Union (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2018).
-
Cheneval, Francis, Alice El-Wakil, ‘The Institutional Design of Referendums: Bottom-Up and Binding’ (2018) 24(3) Swiss Political Science Review 294.
-
Choper, Jesse H., ‘The Political Question Doctrine: Suggested Criteria’ (2005) 54 Duke Law Journal 1457.
-
Christmann, Anna, Die Grenzen direkter Demokratie: Volkentscheide im Spannungsverhältnis von Demokratie und Rechtsstaat (Nomos Verlag 2012).
-
Christmann, Anna, ‘Direct Democracy and the Rule of Law – Assessing a Tense Relationship’ in Wilfried Marxer (ed), Direct Democracy and Minorities (Springer 2012).
-
Christmann, Anna, Deniz Danaci, ‘Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: Direct and Indirect Effects on Religious Minorities in Switzerland’ (2012) 5(1) Politics and Religion 133.
-
Clark, Tom S., The Limits of Judicial Independence (Oxford University Press 2012).
-
Clayton, Richard, Hugh Tomlinson, Fair Trial Rights (Oxford University Press 2010).
-
Cohn, Margit, ‘Form, Formula and Constitutional Ethos: The Political Question/Justiciability Doctrine in Three Common Law Systems’ (2011) 59(3) The American Journal of Comparative Law 675.
-
Colombo, Céline, Hanspeter Kriesi, ‘Referendums and Direct Democracy’ in Robert Rohrschneider, Jacques Thomassen, The Oxford Handbook of Political Representation in Liberal Democracies (Oxford University Press 2020).
-
Comella, Víktor Ferreres, Constitutional Courts and Democratic Values: A European Perspective (Yale University Press 2009).
-
Cooter, Robert D., and Michael D. Gilbert, ‘A Theory of Direct Democracy and the Single Subject Rule’ (2010) 110(3) Columbia Law Review 687.
-
Craig, Paul, ‘Standing, Rights, and the Structure of Legal Argument’ (2003) 9(4) European Public Law 493–508.
-
Craig, Paul, Administrative Law (8th edn., London: Sweet & Maxwell Thomson Reuters 2016).
-
Dalton, Harlon Leigh, ‘Taking the Right to Appeal (More or Less) Seriously’ (1985) 95(1) The Yale Law Journal 62.
-
Danaci, Deniz, ‘The Minaret Ban in Switzerland: An Exception to the Rule?’ in Wilfried Marxer (ed), Direct Democracy and Minorities (Springer 2012).
-
Darpö, Jan, ‘Pulling the Trigger: ENGO Standing Rights and the Enforcement of Environmental Obligations in EU Law’ in Sanja Bogojević, Rosemary Rayfuse (eds), Environmental Rights in Europe and Beyond (Hart Publishing 2018).
-
della, Cananea, Giacinto, Due Process of Law Beyond the State: Requirements of Administrative Procedure (Oxford University Press 2016).
-
Delledonne, Giacomo, ‘Appointing and Electing Constitutional Judges: An Evolving Comparative Landscape’ in Martin Belov (ed), The Role of Courts in Contemporary Legal Orders (Eleven International Publishing 2019).
-
Dicey, Albert Venn, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (originally published 8th edn London: Macmillan 1915, Liberty Classics Reprint 1982).
-
Dixon, Rosalind, Felix Uhlmann, ‘The Swiss Constitution and a weak-form unconstitutional amendment doctrine’ (2018) 16 (1) I•CON 54.
-
Donovan, Todd, Shaun Bowler, ‘Are Voters Competent Enough to Vote on Complex Issues’ in M. Dane Waters (ed) The Initiative and Referendum Almanac: A Comprehensive Guide to the Initiative and Referendum Process in the United States (Durham NC: Carolina Academic Press 2003).
-
Donovan, Todd, Shaun Bowler, ‘Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: An Extension’ (1998) 42 American Journal of Political Science 1020.
-
Drugda, Šimon, ‘The People v Their Representatives: The Slovak Constitutional Court Blocks Referendum on Early Election’ (Verfassungsblog, 14 September 2021) https://verfassungsblog.de/the-people-v-their-representatives/, DOI: 10.17176/20210914-173356-0.
-
Druviete, Ina and Uldis Ozolins, ‘The Latvian Referendum on Russian as a Second State Language’ (2016) 40(2) Language Problems & Language Planning 121.
-
Dudás, Endre, ‘Croatian Constitutional Court: The Referendum on the Cyrillic Script’ (2015) 9(1) Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 126.
-
Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986).
-
Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Harvard University Press 1986).
-
Eisler, Jacob, ‘Dissonant Referendum Design and Turmoil in Representation’ (2019) Public Law (Sweet & Maxwell), http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3378642.
-
Eliantonio, M., Ch.W. Backes, C.H. van Rhee, T. Spronken, A. Berlee, Standing up for Your Right(s) in Europe: A Comparative Study on Legal Standing (Locus Standi) before the EU and Member States’ Courts (Cambridge: Intersentia 2013).
-
Elliott, Mark, ‘Has the Common Law Duty to Give Reasons Come of Age Yet?’ [2011] Public Law 56.
-
Erdős, Csaba, ‘A Kúria két határozata a miniszterelnöki ciklusok számának maximalizálására irányuló népszavazási kezdeményezésekről’ (2017) 4 JEMA 41.
-
De Falco, Vincenzo, Administrative Action and Procedures in Comparative Law (Eleven International Publishing 2018).
-
Fatin-Rouge, Marthe Stefanini, ‘Referendums, Minorities and Individual Freedoms’ in Laurence Morel, Matt Qvortrup (eds), The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy (Routledge 2018).
-
Fazekas, János, ‘Local Governments and Political Question Doctrine in Hungary’ (2019) 17(3) Lex Localis: Journal of Local Self-Government 809–819.
-
Featherstone, Kevin, ‘What Those Calling for Brexit Could Learn from the Greek Bailout Referendum’ (LSE Comments, 6 June 2016) https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2016/06/06/brexit-and-greek-bailout-referendum/.
-
Ferejohn, John A., Larry D. Kramer, ‘Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Institutionalizing Judicial Restraint’ (2002) 77 N.Y.U. Law Review 962.
-
Fix-Fierro, Héctor, Pedro Salazar-Ugarte, ‘Presidentialism’ in Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2012).
-
Fordham, Michael, ‘Reasons: The Third Dimension’ (1998) 3(3) Judicial Review 158 https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.1998.11427014.
-
Forgács, Anna, ‘Hungary’ in Daniel Moeckli, Anna Forgács, Henri Ibi (eds), The Legal Limits of Direct Democracy (Edward Elgar Publishing 2021).
-
Frey, Bruno S., Alois Stutzer, Susanne Neckermann, ‘Direct Democracy and the Constitution’ in A. Marciano (ed), Constitutional Mythologies: New Perspectives on Controlling the State (New York: Springer 2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6784-8_8.
-
Frey, Bruno S., Alois Stutzer, ‘Direct Democracy: Designing a Living Constitution’ in Stefan Voigt (ed), Design of Constitutions (Edward Elgar 2013).
-
Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law (Yale University Press 1964).
-
Fuller, Lon L., ‘Forms and Limits of Adjudication’ (1978) 92 Harvard Law Review 353.
-
Gamble, Barbara S., ‘Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote’ (1997) 41(1) American Journal of Political Science 245.
-
Gardašević, Đorđe ‘Constitutional Interpretations of Direct Democracy in Croatia’ 7 (2015) 12 Iustinianus Primus Law Review 1.
-
Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina, ‘The Hungarian Constitutional Court in Transition – From Actio Popularis to Constitutional Complaint’ (2012) 53(4) Acta Juridica Hungarica 302.
-
Garrone, Pierre, ‘The Code of Good Practice on Referendums’ in Daniel Moeckli, Anna Forgács, Henri Ibi (eds), The Legal Limits of Direct Democracy (Edward Elgar Publishing 2021).
-
Gildersleeve, John, ‘Editing Direct Democracy: Does Limiting the Subject Matter of Ballot Initiatives Offend the First Amendment?’ (2007) 107(6) Columbia Law Review 1437.
-
Ginsburg, Tom, ‘Constitutional Court in East Asia: Understanding Variation’ in Andrew Harding, Peter Leyland (eds), Constitutional Courts: A Comparative Study (Wildy, Simmonds and Hill Publishing 2009).
-
Ginsburg, Tom, Mila Versteeg, ‘Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?’ (2014) 30(3) Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 587–622.
-
Glaser, Andreas, ‘Das Verwaltungsreferendum’ (2012) 113 Schweizerisches Zentral-blatt für Staats- und Verwaltungsrecht 511.
-
Glatthard, Jonas, ‘Schweiz sagt “Ja, ich will” zur Ehe für alle’ (Swissinfo 26 September 2021) https://www.swissinfo.ch/ger/ehe-fuer-alle-wird-voraussichtlich-realitaet/46979242.
-
Glaurdić, Josip, Vuk Vuković, ‘Proxy Politics, Economic Protest, or Traditionalist Backlash: Croatia’s Referendum on the Constitutional Definition of Marriage’ (2016) 68(5) Europe-Asia Studies 803.
-
Gordon III, James D., David B. Magleby, ‘Pre-Election Judicial Review of Initiatives and Referendums’ (1989) 64 Notre Dame Law Review 298.
-
Guarnieri, Carlo, Daniela Piana, ‘Judicial Independence and The Rule of Law: Exploring the European Experience’ in Shimon Shetreet, Christopher Forsyth (eds) The Culture of Judicial Independence: Conceptual Foundations and Practical Challenges (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2012).
-
Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?’ (2001) 29(6) Political Theory 766–781.
-
Haider-Markel, Donald P., Alana Querze, Kara Lindaman, ‘Lose, Win, or Draw? A Reexamination of Direct Democracy and Minority Rights’ (2007) 60 Political Research Quarterly 304.
-
Haller, Walter, ‘Das schweizerische System der halbdirekten Demokratie’ [1994] Zeitschrift für Verwaltung 613.
-
Halmai, Gábor, ‘The Invalid Anti-Migrant Referendum in Hungary’ (Verfassungsblog, 4 October 2016) , accessed 15 March 2022.
-
Ham, C.T. van, Holly Ann Garnett, ‘Building Impartial Electoral Management? Institutional Design, Independence and Electoral Integrity’ (2019) 40(3) International Political Science Review 313.
-
Harding, Andrew, Constitutional Courts: A Comparative Study (Wildy, Simmonds & Hill 2009).
-
Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1994).
-
Helmke, Gretchen, Frances Rosenbluth, ‘Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective’ (2009) 12 Annual Review of Political Science 345.
-
Hill, Ronald J., Stephen White, ‘Russia, the Former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe’ in Matt Qvortrup (ed), Referendums Around the World (Palgrave Macmillan 2018).
-
Hoffmann, Roland, Verfahrensgerechtigkeit: Studien zu einer Theorie prozeduraler Gerechtigkeit (Ferdinand Schöningh 1992).
-
Hug, Simon, George Tsebelis, ‘Veto Players and Referendums Around the World’ 2002 14(4) Journal of Theoretical Politics 466.
-
Hug, Simon, ‘Occurrence and Policy Consequences of Referendums’ (2004) 16 Journal of Theoretical Politics 321.
-
Hurst, Robert, ‘Der Grundsatz der Einheit der Materie’ (DPhil thesis, University of Zurich 2002), https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-70565.
-
Ibi, Henri, ‘Italy’ in Daniel Moeckli, Anna Forgács, Henri Ibi (eds), The Legal Limits of Direct Democracy (Edward Elgar Publishing 2021).
-
Ijabs, Ivars, ‘After the Referendum: Militant Democracy and Nation-Building in Latvia’ (2016) 30(2) East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 288.
-
Inglehart, Ronald, Pippa Norris, ‘Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash’ (Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series No. RWP16-026, August 2016) https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/trump-brexit-and-rise-populism-economic-have-nots-and-cultural-backlash.
-
Issacharoff, Samuel, ‘Democracy’s Deficits’ (2018) 85(2) The University of Chicago Law Review 485.
-
Jackson, Vicki, ‘Comparative Constitutional Law: Methodologies’ in Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2012).
-
Jarinovska, Kristīne, ‘Popular Initiatives as Means of Altering the Core of the Republic of Latvia’ (2013) 20 Juridica International 152.
-
Kazai, Viktor Z., Ágnes Kovács, ‘The Last Days of the Independent Supreme Court of Hungary?’ (Verfassungsblog, 13 October 2020) https://verfassungsblog.de/the-last-days-of-the-independent-supreme-court-of-hungary/, DOI: 10.17176/20201013-233456-0.
-
Kelemen, Katalin, ‘Dissenting Opinions in Constitutional Courts’ (2013) 14(8) German Law Journal 1345.
-
Keller, Helen, Markus Lanter, Andreas Fischer, ‘Volksinitiativen und Völkerrecht: die Zeit ist reif für eine Verfassungsänderung’ (2008) 109(3) Schweizerisches Zentralblatt für Staats- und Verwaltungsrecht 121.
-
Keller, Helen, Severin Meier, ‘Independence and Impartiality in The Judicial Trilemma’ (2017) 111 American Society of International Law 344.
-
Kiener, Regina, Richterliche Unabhängigkeit (Stämpfli Verlag AG 2001).
-
Kiener, Regina, ‘Einführung/Europäische Mindeststandards zum Parlamentswahlrecht im Soft Law der Venedig-Kommission’ in Andreas Glaser, Lorenz Langer (eds), Das Parlamentswahlrecht als rechtsstaatliche Grundlage der Demokratie (Dike Verlag, 2020).
-
Kiener, Regina, Melanie Krüsi, ‘Bedeutungswandel des Rechtsstaats und Folgen für die (direkte) Demokratie am Beispiel völkerrechtswidriger Volksinitiativen’ (2009) 110 Schweizerisches Zentralblatt für Staats- und Verwaltungsrecht 237.
-
Kirchgässner, Gebhard, ‘Direkte Demokratie und Menschenrechte’ in Lars P. Feld, Peter M. Huber, Otmar Jung, Christian Welzel, Fabian Wittreck (eds), Jahrbuch für direkte Demokratie 2009 (Nomos 2010).
-
Klaming, Laura, Ivo Giesen, ‘Access to Justice: The Quality of the Procedure’ (TISCO Working Paper Series on Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems No. 002/2008).
-
Kley, Andreas, ‘Die Einheit der Materie bei Bundesgesetzen und der Stein der Weisen’ (2019) 120 Schweizerisches Zentralblatt für Staats- und Verwaltungsrecht 3.
-
Kochevar, Steven, ‘Amici Curiae in Civil Law Jurisdictions’ (2013) 122 Yale Law Journal 1653.
-
Komáromi, László, ‘Milestones in the History of Direct Democracy in Hungary’ (2013) 9(4) Iustum Aequum Salutare 49.
-
Komáromi, László, ‘Popular Rights in Hungary: A Brief Overview of Ideas, Institutions and Practice from the Late 18th Century until Our Days’ (C2D Working Paper Series. 35/2010).
-
Komáromi, László, ‘A népszavazásra vonatkozó szabályozás változásai az Alaptörvényben és az új népszavazási törvényben’ (2014) 35 MTA Law Working Papers 6.
-
Komáromi, László, ‘Az Alkotmánybíróság határozata a nőkre vonatkozó kedvezményes nyugdíjba vonulási feltételek férfiakra történő kiterjesztésére irányuló népszavazási kezdeményezésről’ [2016] 7(1) JEMA 5.
-
Koopmans, Raymond T., ‘Natural Justice Rediviva? The Right to a Fair Hearing in European Law’ (1992) 39(1) Netherlands International Law Review 175.
-
Kröger, Sandra, ‘Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of the 2016 Brexit Referendum’ (DCU Brexit Institute – Working Paper No.12 2018) http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3312457.
-
Krošlák, Daniel, ‘The Referendum on the So-Called Traditional Family in the Slovak Republic’ [2015] 1 Central and Eastern European Legal Studies 149.
-
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience (Lexington Books 2005).
-
Krygier, Martin, ‘What’s the Point of the Rule of Law?’ (2019) 67 Buffalo Law Review 743.
-
Krygier, Martin, ‘The Challenge of Institutionalisation: Post-Communist “Transitions”, Populism, and the Rule of Law’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 544.
-
Kużelewska, Elżbieta, ‘Same-Sex Marriage – A Happy End Story? The Effectiveness of Referendum on Same-Sex Marriage in Europe’ (2019) 1(24) Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 13.
-
Lanz, Simon, Alessandro Nai, ‘How Elections Shape Campaigning Effects in Direct Democracy’ in Laurence Morel, Matt Qvortrup (eds), The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy (Routledge 2018).
-
Le Sueur, Andew P., ‘Legal Duties to Give Reasons’ (1999) 52 Current Legal Problems 150.
-
Lind, E. Allen, Tom Tyler, The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (New York: Plenum Press 1988).
-
Linder, Wolf, Schweizerische Demokratie: Institutionen, Prozesse, Perspektiven (Bern: Verlag Paul Haupt 2012).
-
Lublin, David, ‘The 2012 Latvia Language Referendum’ (2013) 32 Electoral Studies 385.
-
Luksic, Igor, Andrej Kurnik, ‘Slovenia’ in Andreas Auer and Micheal Bützer (eds), Direct Democracy: The Eastern and Central European Experience (Ashgate 2001).
-
Lupia, Arthur, John G. Matsusaka, ‘Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions’ (2004) 7 Annual Review of Political Science 463.
-
Lupia, Arthur, ‘Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections’ (1994) 88(1) American Political Science Review 69.
-
MacCormick, Neil, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford University Press 1994).
-
Macdonald, Roderick A., Hoi Kong, ‘Judicial Independence as a Constitutional Virtue’ in Michel Rosenfeld, András Sajó (eds), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2012).
-
MacDowall, Andrew, ‘Voters back Viktor Orbán’s rejection of EU migrant quotas’ (Politico 2 October 2016).
-
Mangione, Gabriella, ‘Presentation at the Conference: Brief Remarks on Referendums in Italy’ (2018) 4(1) International Comparative Jurisprudence 7.
-
Marczewska-Rytko, Maria (ed), Handbook of Direct Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989 (Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers 2018).
-
Marshall, P.D., ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Right to Appeal’ (2011) 22(1) Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 1.
-
Marxer, Wilfried (ed), Direct Democracy and Minorities (Springer 2012).
-
Marxer, Wilfried, ‘Foreword’ in Wilfried Marxer (ed), Direct Democracy and Minorities (Springer 2012).
-
Marxer, Wilfried, ‘Minorities and Direct Democracy in Liechtenstein’ in Wilfried Marxer (ed), Direct Democracy and Minorities (Springer 2012).
-
Marxer, Wilfried, ‘Initiatives in Liechtenstein: Safety Valve in a Complex System of Government’ in Maija Setälä and Theo Schiller (eds), Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe: Procedures and Consequences of Agenda-Setting by Citizens (Palgrave Macmillan 2012).
-
Marxer, Wilfried, Direkte Demokratie in Liechtenstein: Entwicklung, Regelungen, Praxis (Bendern: Verlag der Liechtensteinischen Akademischen Gesellschaft 2018).
-
Marxer, Wilfried, ‘Liechtenstein’ in Daniel Moeckli, Anna Forgács, Henri Ibi (eds), The Legal Limits of Direct Democracy (Edward Elgar Publishing 2021).
-
Mashaw, Jerry L., Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy (Cambridge University Press 2018).
-
Matsusaka, John G., ‘Direct Democracy Works’ (2005) 19(2) Journal of Economic Perspectives 185.
-
Matsusaka, John G., Let the People Rule: How Direct Democracy Can Meet the Populist Challenge (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2020).
-
McIntyre, Joe, The Judicial Function: Fundamental Principles of Contemporary Judging (Springer Singapore 2019).
-
Mécs, János, ‘Az egyértelműség követelménye az országos népszavazási kérdések hitelesítése során’ (Jogi Tanulmányok, ELTE Állam-és Jogtudományi Kar Állam-és Jogtudományi Doktori Iskola, 2018).
-
Michael, Douglas C. ‘Preelection Judicial Review: Taking the Initiative in Voter Protection’ (1983) 71 California Law Review 1216.
-
Miles, Joanna ‘Standing under the Human Rights Act 1998: Theories of Rights Enforcement & the Nature of Public Law Adjudication’ (2000) 59(1) Cambridge Law Journal 133.
-
Miller, Kenneth P., Direct Democracy and the Courts (Cambridge University Press 2009).
-
Moeckli, Daniel, ‘Of Minarets and Foreign Criminals: Swiss Direct Democracy and Human Rights’ (2011) 11 Human Rights Law Review 774.
-
Moeckli, Daniel, ‘Die Teilungültigerklärung und Aufspaltung von Volksinitiativen’ (2014) 115 Schweizerisches Zentralblatt für Staats- und Verwaltungsrecht 579.
