You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items :

  • Author or Editor: John A. Rothchild x
  • Law -Professional x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

John A. Rothchild

The steady growth of internet commerce over the past twenty years has given rise to a host of new legal issues in a broad range of fields. This authoritative Research Handbook comprises chapters by leading scholars which will provide a solid foundation for newcomers to the subject and also offer exciting new insights that will further the understanding of e-commerce experts. Key topics covered include: contracting, payments, intellectual property, extraterritorial enforcement, alternative dispute resolution, social media, consumer protection, network neutrality, online gambling, domain name governance, and privacy.
This content is available to you

John A. Rothchild

You do not have access to this content

John A. Rothchild

The idea of network neutrality has dominated telecommunication policy discussions over the past few years to an extent unprecedented in the history of that subject matter. In March 2015, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issued a detailed scheme of regulation that makes network neutrality the law of the land. The path by which the FCC arrived at the Order was anything but direct, and the fate of the Order is yet to be decided by the courts. This chapter offers a guide through the thorny paths of network neutrality. The chapter begins with a review of the historical precursors to network neutrality regulation, starting with a 1956 court decision that disapproved an effort by AT & T to ban the attachment of devices to the phone system, and continuing through FCC rulemakings in the 1960s and 1970s that regulated the participation of telephone companies in the provision of services that involve data processing. These competition-enhancing rules led to a 2005 FCC policy statement that set forth principles that the FCC would apply to ensure that Internet service providers would not be able to distort competition by discriminating against particular content, applications, or non-harmful devices. These principles were then implemented in a 2010 rule known as the Open Internet Order. In a 2014 decision, the D.C. Circuit invalidated the Order as inconsistent with the FCC’s statutory authority. The FCC thereupon initiated a new rulemaking, which resulted in its issuance of a new Open Internet Order in 2015. As of the writing of this chapter a challenge to the 2015 Order is pending before the D.C. Circuit. The chapter continues by analyzing the content of the 2015 Order, placing it in the context of its historical antecedents. It concludes by addressing several objections that have been raised against network neutrality regulation.