You are looking at 1 - 10 of 12 items

  • Author or Editor: Albert Sanchez Graells x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Albert Sanchez Graells and Francisco Marcos

There seems to be a clear trend of increased protection of ‘corporate human rights’ and, more specifically, due process rights (or procedural fairness) in the field of enforcement of competition law. To a large extent, that trend is based on the uncritical extension of human rights protection to corporate defendants by a process of simple assimilation of corporate and individual defendants. This chapter briefly explores the rationale behind the creation of due process rights when the individual is the beneficiary of such protection. It then goes on to critically assess if the same need exists for the extension of those protections to corporate defendants, particularly in the field of competition law or antitrust enforcement. It concludes with some warnings concerning the diminishing effectiveness of competition law prohibitions and of human law protection that can result from an overstretched conception of due process protection in this area of EU economic law. From a substantive perspective, the chapter submits that the extension of human rights to corporations cannot be uncritical and should not be completely symmetrical to that for human beings; but that it rather needs to be necessarily adapted to their circumstances. To put it more bluntly, it is suggested that in the field of the enforcement of economic law, administrative law procedures should be sound and there should clearly be a strong system of judicial review in place, but corporations should not have access to broader constitutional or human rights protections and any perceived shortcomings in the design and application of those procedures should remain within the sphere of regulatory reform. KEYWORDS Due process, procedural fairness, good administration, corporate human rights, human rights, competition law, antitrust law, enforcement, effectiveness. JEL CODES K21, K23, K42.
You do not have access to this content

Okeoghene Odudu and Albert Sanchez-Graells

This chapter assesses the framework enabling private parties to enforce competition law and the implications this has both in relation to the evolution of national tort law in European Union (EU) member states and for an incipient acquis of EU tort law. It considers how the law has evolved since the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), in Courage v Crehan, confirmed that those able to show that they have suffered loss as a result of a competition law violation are able to recover compensatory damages and the progress made since the adoption of Directive 2014/104/EU on antitrust damages. The chapter focuses on four selected topics: the erosion of the requirement of fault; the erosion of individual responsibility; the extension of recoverable losses; and modifications to the burden of proof arising from a presumption of damage resulting from certain types of anti-competitive behaviour. It concludes by questioning whether traditional tort law doctrines at member-state level can survive under the pressure of these EU law developments. The chapter indicates areas of uncertainty that may serve to guide future research efforts.

This content is available to you

Edited by Grith S. Ølykke and Albert Sanchez-Graells

This content is available to you

Edited by Grith S. Ølykke and Albert Sanchez-Graells

This content is available to you

Edited by Grith S. Ølykke and Albert Sanchez-Graells

This content is available to you

Edited by Grith S. Ølykke and Albert Sanchez-Graells

This content is available to you

Grith Skovgaard Ølykke and Albert Sanchez-Graells

This introductory chapter provides an essential background to the research project and the ‘law and political science’ methodology employed in each of the substantive chapters. It details the structure of the book and lays out the main research questions that the individual contributions and the general conclusions aim to answer.
You do not have access to this content

Albert Sanchez-Graells and Grith Skovgaard Ølykke

This final chapter provides a general conclusion to the research project. It picks up on the main themes laid out in the assessment of the EU legislative procedure from a political science perspective and builds upon the insights gained with the analyses of distinct legal issues in each of the substantive chapters, which are used as case studies. Ultimately, the chapter answers the questions: how did the Commission, Council and Parliament generally interact in the legislative process; whether one or more EU institutions had the upper hand in the negotiations, particularly considering the proposed and amended texts; and, most importantly, what is the predicted interpretation by the CJEU of the examined provisions in the 2014 Public Procurement Package and to what extent is that likely to alter or neutralise the result of the legislative process. Additionally, maybe from a more holistic perspective, the final outcome of the 2011–14 legislative process is assessed, so as to conclude and determine whether it has resulted in a reformation or a deformation of the EU public procurement rules now encapsulated in the 2014 Public Procurement Package.
This content is available to you

Edited by Grith S. Ølykke and Albert Sanchez-Graells

You do not have access to this content

Edited by Grith S. Ølykke and Albert Sanchez-Graells

Using an innovative ‘law and political science’ methodology, this timely book carries out a critical assessment of the reform of the EU public procurement rules. It provides a rich account of the policy directions and the spaces for national regulatory decisions in the transposition of the 2014 Public Procurement Package, as well as areas of uncertainty and indications on how to interpret the rules in order to make them operational in practice.