You are looking at 1 - 10 of 10 items

  • Author or Editor: Bart van Klink x
Clear All Modify Search
This content is available to you

Edited by Sanne Taekema, Bart van Klink and Wouter de Been

This content is available to you

Wouter de Been, Sanne Taekema and Bart van Klink

The introductory chapter aims to clarify current debates on facts and norms, by outlining different positions and the points of contention between them, and by mapping a number of strong theoretical positions on the relationship between facts, norms and values. These positions include the recent contributions to the debate on fact, norms and values by Brian Leiter and Hilary Putnam, as well as the recent insights from legal hermeneutics. These strong positions are meant to provide an overview, a broad vista, of current debates that can help us place the contributions in the other parts of the book. The aim is to sketch the setting of contemporary legal debates on the extent to which factual judgments influence normative judgments and vice versa.
You do not have access to this content

Facts and Norms in Law

Interdisciplinary Reflections on Legal Method

Edited by Sanne Taekema, Bart van Klink and Wouter de Been

Facts and Norms in Law: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Legal Method presents an innovative collection of essays on the relationship between descriptive and normative elements in legal inquiry and legal practice. What role does empirical data play in law? New insights in philosophy, the social sciences and the humanities have forced the relationship between facts and norms on to the agenda, especially for legal scholars doing interdisciplinary work. This timely volume carefully combines critical perspectives from a range of different disciplinary traditions and theoretical positions.
This content is available to you

Edited by Bart van Klink and Ubaldus de Vries

This content is available to you

Bart van Klink and Ubaldus de Vries

You do not have access to this content

Edited by Bart van Klink and Ubaldus de Vries

You do not have access to this content

Academic Learning in Law

Theoretical Positions, Teaching Experiments and Learning Experiences

Edited by Bart van Klink and Ubaldus de Vries

This timely book calls for a critical re-evaluation of university legal education, with the particular aim of strengthening its academic nature. It emphasizes lecturers’ responsibility to challenge the assumptions students have about law, and the importance of putting law in a theoretical and social context that allows for critical reflection and sceptical detachment. In addition, the book reports upon teaching experiences and innovations, offering tools for teachers to strengthen the academic nature of legal education.
You do not have access to this content

Bart van Klink and Oliver W. Lembcke

The topic of our contribution is the relation between is and ought in law and its implications for the autonomy of law and the possibility (or even necessity) of interdisciplinary research, as discussed in the debate between Jellinek and Kelsen. We take Jellinek’s general theory of the state as a starting point, because it offers a good opportunity to reflect on the interrelation of the factual and normative side of political order and the role law plays in connecting these two sides. Jellinek holds an exceptional position within normative legal positivism that is in line with the contemporary trend toward interdisciplinary research. However attractive it may be in this respect, is it a strong position or is it threatening the autonomy of law from the perspective of legal science, as Kelsen claims? And, if so, would that necessarily be a bad thing? With Kelsen, we believe that some kind of ‘border control’ between scientific disciplines is necessary, because otherwise the specific access to reality which a discipline offers gets lost. However, we consider his attempt to purify the science of law too rigid and ultimately not convincing. Therefore, we suggest revisiting the work of Jellinek, which has received less scholarly attention. In turn, Kelsen’s criticism helps to identify weak points and challenges in Jellinek’s theory, such as its exclusive focus on the nation state.
You do not have access to this content

Bart van Klink