The main purpose of this chapter is to argue that the welfare regime approach (WRA), to social policy is, as the author puts it, well past its use-by-date. There is obviously some distance between this aim and interrogating whether the current economic crisis is systemic or not in some broader sense. However, part and parcel of the current crisis is how scholarship, ideology and policy respond to it. In casting aside the WRA, the chapter argues that its warranted demise, although almost certain continuing dominance over social policy scholarship, is part and parcel and reflection of the systemic nature of the crisis. Why this should be so in general terms is laid out. Subsequently, the chapter offer a critical overview of the WRA, highlighting its undue and inappropriate reliance on ill-fitting ideal types, its inappropriate extension in application in time and place beyond both developed countries and the post-war boom and its most immediate aftermath (for both of which it is arguably also more or less analytically inappropriate), its increasingly casual approach to theory and convergence towards mainstream thinking, and its failures in capacity to address policy alternatives. These devastating weaknesses of the WRA derive primarily from its failure to incorporate a full understanding of neoliberalism in general and of the financialization at its heart in particular. Born out of the post-war boom and the early clash of its conditions with neoliberalism, the WRA has failed to move on even though it has consolidated its position as the leading way in which to understand social policy. As a result, as taken up in the concluding remarks, just as paralysis in the discipline of economics can be taken as an index of the systemic nature of the current crisis (being exposed as both inadequate and unable to change), so the same is exposed as applied to WRA and social policy.