You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items

  • Author or Editor: Claire Daniel x
Clear All Modify Search
You do not have access to this content

Claire Daniel

This chapter provides a review of developments in theory, methods and technology since the 1960s used in planning support systems for monitoring the implementation of planning policy. Monitoring is accepted in theory as an important step to improving planning decisions but, in practice, ongoing monitoring and post-implementation evaluation of planning policy has been largely neglected. Improvements to computing power and Internet speeds, together with technological advances in the fields of geographic information systems, artificial intelligence and automated image recognition make it feasible to track urban change in a relatively automated fashion, allowing planners to respond to problems and improve urban outcomes. However, examples from professional practice in the UK, the USA and Australia show more work needs to be done to integrate these technologies into the planning process, including the development of data standards and mechanisms to encourage open source and collaborative development of software tools.

You do not have access to this content

Claire R. Parfitt and Daniel F. Robinson

We map the global intellectual property (IP) rights regime for agriculture, and the political and economic structures that support that regime. There is a particular focus on international trade agreements, and the integral role of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). We explore the ways in which this global regime translates into a convergence of agricultural IP laws at the domestic level. This is demonstrated through a review of recent legal developments in jurisdictions such as Australia, Canada and the United States that reflect a tendency towards the expansive reading of IP rights. The chapter tracks plant breeding developments during the twenty-first century, against IP law expansion and the concentration of economic power. The authors argue that there are interrelationships between socio-legal, political economic and technological developments. The emergence of plant-related IP is influenced by powerful economic interests. The establishment of the IP regime has facilitated the growth of those economic interests. While IP rights are justified on the basis that they encourage innovation, in practice, they appear to encourage only particular forms of innovation, while locking out others. Finally, the chapter explores other possibilities for regulation of agricultural inputs that may be more conducive to producer control and innovation. The authors acknowledge developments at the international level that find that a radical transformation of food and farming systems is necessary to meet future global food needs. This transformation will require changes to the ways we regulate food and farming inputs, to reduce corporate power and control, and to promote a more democratic approach to food production and distribution. Some alternative regulatory regimes in places such as India, Malaysia and Thailand are discussed briefly.